User talk:TheBestEditorInEngland
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, TheBestEditorInEngland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MidwestSalamander (talk) 02:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (HMS Southsea Castle (1697)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating HMS Southsea Castle (1697).
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
nice work, are you intending on creating a List of ships called HMS Southsea castle
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 10:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
{{Re|Hughesdarren}}
- Thanks for reviewing HMS Southsea Castle (1697) User:Hughesdarren.
- I am not only planning on creating a list for Southsea Castle ships (as there was a ship launched only the year before in 1696 also called the HMS Southsea Castle), but I am also intending on creating articles for all 1694 Group :32-Gunner class ships (as well as an article for the class itself).
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bank of England £100,000,000 note, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Let's fix that shall we TheBestEditorInEngland (talk) 18:55, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Bank of England £100,000,000 note
[edit]On 23 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bank of England £100,000,000 note, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that £100,000,000 notes known as "Titans" are locked away in the Bank of England? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bank of England £100,000,000 note. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bank of England £100,000,000 note), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Milhist!
[edit]Hello TheBestEditorInEngland and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
- If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:07, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]DYK nomination of Battle of Muster Green
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Battle of Muster Green at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Battle of Muster Green
[edit]On 5 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Muster Green, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the site (pictured) of the Battle of Muster Green in Haywards Heath was the farthest a Royalist army advanced through Sussex during the First English Civil War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Muster Green. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Muster Green), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
March Madness 2020
[edit]G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
- Hi BEiE. You seem to be off to a flying start to this, and should be in line for some classy bling if you keep it up. Just a reminder: when you assess one of the previously bot-assessed articles could you remember to delete it from the list? To prevent another editor reassessing the same article. This applies whether you reckon that it meets the B class criteria or not. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminding me, I was under the impression that they were categorised as bot-assessed and would leave the category automatically when assessed by a user. I've since deleted them from the list and will do so from now on when I assess more. TheBestEditorInEngland (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
I have no idea where ANZSP came from. I am having difficulty making the assessment work with that template. I want to assess it at C, but everything I do shows as Start class. So I just copied a random format from somewhere and that showed as B, which I didn't want either. If you can demonstrate a C-class assessed template, I'll copy that. Thanks for noticing! Storye book (talk) 23:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Storye book: As far as I know C class doesn't have an assessment template, it's just added like with stub class or start class, I believe B class is the first class which uses the assessment template since it's the first class which is required to be peer-reviewed before being able to be acknowledged as such. I've tried changing the class to C class but that makes the article think it's a start class and automatically adds the B class template... I'm by no means an experienced reviewer and having never come across this before and think it would be best to ask for help in the MilHist talk page as people there would have a better idea as to what's gone on and how to fix it. Regards, TheBestEditorInEngland (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I know that some project banner templates don't have provision for a class C parameter, so maybe that's the problem. I shall ask. Storye book (talk) 10:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Hard Worker's Barnstar | |
For scoring 1,169 points in the WikiProject Military history 2020 edit-a-thon March Madness, I am pleased to award you this token of appreciation from the Project. Thank you, and well done. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC) |
Welcome to the GOCE!
[edit]Welcome to WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors "Make it say what it means and mean what it says" – Wikipedia: How to copy edit |
Hello TheBestEditorInEngland and welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors (GOCE)! We are glad that you have decided to help us in our mission to improve the quality of writing on the English Wikipedia! Here are some links that you might find helpful to get started on your copy-editing journey!
- A how-to guide to Wikipeda copyediting
- Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MOS), a helpful guide to refer to while copy editing
- A quick guide to writing on Wikipedia
You can help with copy-editing requests if you already have familiarity with the MOS and considerable English copy-editing skills, or start with articles tagged for copy editing to gain experience.
Thank you so much for joining the GOCE, we appreciate it!
For the GOCE, --Puddleglum2.0(How's my driving?) 23:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Bramber Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
[edit]G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open
[edit]G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
[edit]G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
[edit]Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
November 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Stroness. I noticed that you recently removed content from Battle of Tippermuir without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Stroness (talk) 08:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
[edit]Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Correction to previous election announcement
[edit]Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
[edit]Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
[edit]Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators is now open!
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
[edit]Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Oasis Live '25 Tour
[edit]On 2 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oasis Live '25 Tour, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Liam and Noel Gallagher's band Oasis announced "the most controversial band reunion since the Sex Pistols' 1996 Filthy Lucre Tour", Noel's daughter Anaïs Gallagher criticised some fans for ageism and sexism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anaïs Gallagher. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oasis Live '25 Tour), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.