User talk:TheAnaheimDude

Welcome!

Hi TheAnaheimDude! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 〜 Adflatuss • talk 05:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Black Heart (video game) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Black Heart (video game). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 06:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Black Heart (video game) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Black Heart (video game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Black Heart (video game)

Hello TheAnaheimDude, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Black Heart (video game), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Heart (video game).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MicrobiologyMarcus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 16:39, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Evercade, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your repeated massive additions and reverts at Evercade are indistinguishable from disruptive vandalism. Please stop. Walt Yoder (talk) 22:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Walt Yoder (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing certain areas of Wikipedia for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 14:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheAnaheimDude (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked because I want to keep editing the Wikipedia article. I'm so sorry for disruptive editing.TheAnaheimDude (talk) 20:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Could you describe the disruptive editing, say why you did it, and indicate what edits you want to make? PhilKnight (talk) 22:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheAnaheimDude (talk) 20:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheAnaheimDude (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to unblocked because I want to keep editing the Wikipedia article. TheAnaheimDude (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 22:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheAnaheimDude (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail: after List of Evercade cartridges was split off the main article, TheAnaheimDude has started the same behavior there. As @TheAnaheimDude: doesn't seem to have acknowledged the issues with his edits on that topic, can the block be updated? Walt Yoder (talk) 23:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the issue is making edits like Special:Diff/1183052590 that add 50kB of content, and then Special:Diff/1183052636 that removes the content added 1 minute prior. Walt Yoder (talk) 23:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Black-Heart-flyer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Black-Heart-flyer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Evercade cartridges. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NoNAja (talk) 21:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Evercade and List of Evercade cartridges) for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 10:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TheAnaheimDude, if you continue to make edits like the ones at List of Evercade cartridges, you will likely be blocked sitewide next time. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 10:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 22:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Isabelle Belato, Walt Yoder, and ThomasO1989: This turned out to be a somewhat extensive sockpuppet case, please see tag and the other 8-10 accounts I uncovered. -- ferret (talk) 22:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for being unblocked.

Hi, this is TheAnaheimDude here. I deeply apologize for being blocked even without realizing it. I do wish to get unblocked so I can edit various articles here on Wikipedia. Will that be okay? TheAnaheimDude (talk) 06:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be mindful that your talk page should be used exclusively to discuss your block. Stop using it to continue the same disruptive edits that led to your initial block. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 22:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Confirmed block evasion as recently as yesterday.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]