User talk:Thaurisil
SergeantBolt (t,c) 09:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
[edit]Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Thaurisil! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (talk) 06:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:B00004UD9C.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:B00004UD9C.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the help
[edit]Thanks for cleaning up after several of my sloppy linkless tags with no date on them. I'm a little dim sometimes. --Pigman (talk • contribs) 03:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: Amy Sillman
[edit]Hi Thaurisil, Thanks for your kind comments re: the Amy Sillman page. I am the original author of the text, which does appear elsewhere online. I do hold the copyright to the material, but don't own the website on which it appears. Is it possible for this eternal website to verify copyright clearance to Wiki? Is there an email, or online verification page that they can submit to? If you could please let me know would be very helpful. Thanks again for your assistance. --Infoart 12:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thaurisil,
You're awesome! Thanks so much for the help. Will sort out some kind of validation with Wiki via the links you posted. Best, --Infoart 18:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
List of Manchester United F.C. players
[edit]Hello Thaurisil, you have done a great job on the List of Manchester United F.C. players. I believe it belongs among Wikipedia's featured lists. You should nominate it today. Regards, Crzycheetah 21:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC).
- According to stretford.co.uk, Graeme Hogg had 107(2 subs) appearances. Since you've changed the number of appearances to 108(2), I am just curious where you got that number from and which source is more reliable. Thanks, Crzycheetah 18:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC).
Hi. I noticed that you've moved the article Jim Brown (soccer) to James Brown (American footballer). While the second title is also correct, I've moved it back to its original title. There are three reasons. 1. Soccer, instead of football, is the term used in USA, and the player is famous for his playing days in USA. 2. The term "American footballer" can be quite easily confused with "American football". 3. Despite his official name being "James", it is quite common for Scots (and of course many other people) to be called "Jim". For example, this article from the U.S. National Soccer Hall of Fame [1], even with the title being "James Brown", refers to him as "Jim" in the whole article. That's why I named the article as such when I created the page as I think this is a better title. I hope you're okay with it. Chanheigeorge 06:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
List of Manchester United players
[edit]I see that you have been adding as many players as possible to List of Manchester United F.C. players. I found a website that has information on all but one player [2] that does not have an article on the talk page. The missing player is Alfred Steward. But, is Alfred Steward the same as Alf Steward?. Both are GK, both played about the same time. For the website from above, some players named "Jim" or "Jack" could be under "James" or "John", respectively. Let me know if you need any help! Patken4 02:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Second Life
[edit]Second Life is a Featured article candidate! frummer 03:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:DonMoenGiveThanksAlbumcover.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:DonMoenGiveThanksAlbumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Shh! People will think I make a habit of editing United articles... After making that edit I had to create Graham Baker just to make up for it ;-) Seriously though, good job on the list. Oldelpaso 21:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Camp Cuddly Pines: Power Tool Massacre
[edit]Please stop removing the orphan tag and giving no reason for it. The article is not linked from any articles. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 05:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- [3] CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 17:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- The reason why I didn't put it on the article itself is because IMO there are too many tags on articles these days, and some like this would likely baffle readers. Thanks, CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 12:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I note you have previously corresponded with the above user regarding his contributions. You may be interested in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts#Infoart and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts/Infoart articles, where there is an attempt at co-ordinating a cleanup of the contributions and having Infoart to comply with guidelines and policies. LessHeard vanU 15:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Manchester United F.C.
[edit]Not wanting to jump in and remove legitimate references, I just thought I'd ask why you had decided to change all the references to the Official Illustrated History of Manchester United to a single reference. I would have thought it would be more appropriate to have each reference refer to the specific page where the fact was mentioned, but if there's a Wikipedia guideline going against this then fair enough. Was just wondering if you could give me some clarification about this. PeeJay 07:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Short article reverts
[edit]Ummm. I'm adding invisible comments to copyvio templated articles so that these articles do not clutter up the Special:Shortpages list when it is next run. Please explain why you are reverting me on these? The comment in no way effects the copyright violation examination process, it just invisibly bumps up the article's character count so that it does not clutter the short pages list. - TexasAndroid 13:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Adding it into the template only makes a difference if the template is substed. And if it is substed, there's no need for extra, as the substed copyvio template is plenty large. As it is, though, without substing, the length of the article is just the length of the template call, unless I add the comment. For a little more explanation on exactly why I do this, see this edit I made earlier today, explaining it in another discussion. Anyway, I'm gonna go click the revert button on those two, to again bump them out of range for the shortpages report. - TexasAndroid 03:48, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
request
[edit]Richmond, California id like to make a request for comment in the 80 image section please. Cholga saYS THANKS!Cholga is a SUPERSTAR¡Talk2Cholga!Sexy Contribs 01:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Adoption
[edit]Hi Thaurisil,
Thank you for your offer to adopt me which I gladly accept.
Krautmaster 10:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Boyzonesaidanddone.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Boyzonesaidanddone.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 16:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Singapore Meetup 4 date changed
[edit]
Please indicate your interest on the meetup page. |
v • d • |
Hi Thaurisil, you were originally invited to Singapore meetup 4. However, due to the lack of response, the date of the meetup has been changed to November. Please refer to this page for more information. -- ZhongHan (Email) 05:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Disambiguation page piping
[edit]Thanks for your help on Ecstasy (disambiguation), but note that while piping is generally discouraged on disambiguation pages, piping in order to format titles correctly is actually encouraged. —Piet Delport 02:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
FL Main page proposal
[edit]You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination this year. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual main page will resemble either an excerpted list format or an abbreviated text format. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. Right now debate seems to be among support for the current selective democratic/consensus based proposal, a selective dictatorial approach like that used at WP:TFA or a non-selective first in line/calendar approach like that used at WP:POTD. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Featured List of the Day Experiment
[edit]There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 15:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Vince Hayes
[edit]Hi, I've removed Bradford City from your entry on Vince Hayes. City have never had a player called Vince Hayes. Do you have a source for it? Maybe you mean Bradford Park Avenue? Peanut4 (talk) 03:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Would you reconsider your AFD nomination in light of the sources I've found and added to the article? (The problem was that the sources identify him as "George A. Stevens".). Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed from the list of participants at WP:FOOTY that you are a Manchester United fan. A task force has been set up to help improve articles related to Manchester United, and we are looking for participants to help with the effort. If you would be interested, please add your name to the list at the task force's page. Thanks. – PeeJay 10:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Marc Bureau
[edit]Hi. You've recently made contributions to the Marc Bureau article. Would you like to add your opinion on the article name itself on the talkpage? Thanks. LarRan (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Thaurisil! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 36 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Ashley Grimes (Irish footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Main Page appearance
[edit]Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the List of Manchester United F.C. players know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on March 26, 2012. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/March 26, 2012. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Since Manchester United Football Club played their first competitive match in October 1886, more than 850 players have made a competitive first-team appearance for the club, of whom almost 200 players have made at least 100 appearances (including substitute appearances). Manchester United's record appearance-maker is Ryan Giggs (pictured), who has made more than 900 appearances since his debut in 1991; he broke Bobby Charlton's previous appearance record in the 2008 UEFA Champions League Final. Giggs also holds the record for the most starts, having started in 764 games. Charlton is the club's top goalscorer with 249 goals in his 17 years with the club. Seven other players have made more than 500 appearances, including three members of the 1968 European Cup-winning team and three members of the 1999 Treble-winning team. Other than Charlton, only two players have scored more than 200 goals for the club.
Orphaned non-free media (File:Otownalbum.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Otownalbum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DonMoenHidingPlaceAlbumCover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:DonMoenHidingPlaceAlbumCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DonMoenTronodeGraciaAlbumCover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:DonMoenTronodeGraciaAlbumCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DonMoenGodinUsAlbumCover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:DonMoenGodinUsAlbumCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DonMoenGodWillMakeaWayAlbumCover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:DonMoenGodWillMakeaWayAlbumCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JosephArthurCometoWhereImFrom.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:JosephArthurCometoWhereImFrom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)