User talk:Thatcherm

January 2018

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I note in particular your deceptive editing of the ARA General Belgrano article. Nick-D (talk) 10:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Falklands War. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for an indefinite period as you are editing only to push a viewpoint, and are doing so by blatantly misrepresenting a photo and a newspaper article. This is not the kind of conduct which contributes to developing an encyclopedia. Nick-D (talk) 11:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]