User talk:That Space Nerd
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Thank you That Space Nerd (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Huge History section text: Source?
[edit]Hi That Space Nerd,
Special:Diff/1046568381 looks as if it has been copied from somewhere, perhaps after translation. Could you please tell me where the text is from?
Thanks in advance and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- http://www.clhs.edu.my/history.php
I translated and edited it
I also study there
I undid it because they told me not to do it yet
— Preceding unsigned comment added by That Space Nerd (talk • contribs) 12:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)- Thanks; they're correct about not doing this: Copying text from the website violates Wikipedia's copyright policy (see WP:COPYVIO). I have removed the affected page revisions for now.
- Please note that, especially if you're in contact with representatives of the school, you have a conflict of interest and are discouraged from editing the article directly. I'll add two standardized notification messages below. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Ok Thanks That Space Nerd (talk) 13:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
By the way, i think that they dont want me to pulbish it is because they don’t want me to write inaccurate or negative information That Space Nerd (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC) That Space Nerd (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]Hello That Space Nerd! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]Hello, That Space Nerd. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Removals
[edit]Hello, I'm Fyrael. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Fyrael (talk) 04:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
sure That Space Nerd (talk) 04:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- The edit was fine, it just could have been improved by a proper edit summary saying something like "
removing promotional content / not [[WP:NPOV|neutral]]
". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Zencoder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Per WP:SIRS, I do not think the sources shown on the article count for notability criteria, along with the fact that it seems that one product created (the Flix Cloud mentioned in the article) by this company also had a Wikipedia article created by the same person who did this article that was then speedy deleted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Future of Technology 2010 | No mention of sponsorship with Zencoder. | Bloomberg is a trusted source, although it does lean left-wing according to AllSides (https://www.allsides.com/news-source/bloomberg-media-bias). | The article is over angel investors, some of which happened to invest in Zencoder, but it does not concern Zencoder at all. | ✘ No |
On2 Technologies and Zencoder Partner to Create On-Demand Video Encoding Service | Following accsess via the Internet Archive, the story comes from On2's PR Newswire. | Bloomberg is a trusted source, although it does lean left-wing according to AllSides (https://www.allsides.com/news-source/bloomberg-media-bias). However, the story being from the On2 PR newswire means that we cannot trust if this was true. | Concerns a large project partially started by Zencoder | ✘ No |
Google Closes On2 Technology Acquisition | The article is about Google buying the partner company for their product, and this is from Google's own Investor news. | This is Google's own Investor page, they cannot be trusted to provide reliable details on their acquisition. | ~ If talking about how the product was shut down because of this acquisition, then yes, it is significant. | ✘ No |
Encoding Performance: Comparing Zencoder, Encoding.com, Sorenson & Panda | First sentance in the post states that it was paid for by Zencoder. | First sentance in the post states that it was paid for by Zencoder. | Directly talks about the performance of Zencoder. | ✘ No |
Brightcove Acquires Zencoder | The article is from Zencoder's own blog. | The article is from Zencoder's own blog, so we cannot trust the reliability of the statments. | Directly talks about Zencoder being bought. | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
You are the latest person to edit the article that has a userpage, so that is why I am informing you of this. WikipeidaNeko (talk) 00:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)