User talk:Thanos777

Welcome!

Hello, Thanos777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Powers ^T 02:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Sylar, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Madchester 05:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Usernames

Although you have proven yourself to be a valid contributor, I regret to inform you that your username is unacceptable. This account is hereby blocked. You have three options:

You can abandon this account and start over with a new one. If you do this, you will lose your edit history.
You can post a request on Wikipedia:Changing username; if you choose this, you will first need to post a request on your talkpage to be unblocked.
You can walk away from the project in disgust.

To be honest, I hope you choose 1 or 2, but 3 is always a possibility. DS 17:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my Name

I would like to change my Name from "Cornholioprime" to "Thanos777" WITHOUT losing my Edit History.

Please help!!!

Thanks.

Cornholioprime 05:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done, you're unblocked. Now just go on over to Wikipedia:Changing username and post your request (stating your current username and your desired one), and a Bureaucrat will get to you within 24 hours or so. Excelsior. DS 05:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

As requested, I have renamed you as User:Thanos777. You may now like to move this page to your new username. Warofdreams talk 23:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be near nonexistent:

Edit summary usage for Thanos777: 1% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 21:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

I saw your request on the Administrators' Noticeboard. It doesn't require an administrator to move most pages; you just click the "move" tab on the top of the page and follow the instructions. In any event, I'm not an administrator, but I made this move for you. Please make sure it's how you want it now, and feel free to let me know if there are any questions. Newyorkbrad 18:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yukk!

Yes I do remember it. And I was surprised to find out that there was no article for the Plasticman Comedy Adventure whosit. But yeah, vive Mighty Man and his dog.Bjones 02:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fembot/Gynoid

Hi Thanos777, I just reverted the changes you made to Fembot. That article was merged into Gynoid some time ago. That kind of thing should not be undone without prior discussion, so if you would like to propose that the articles be split, you can do that here: Talk:Gynoid. Thanks. Robotman1974 05:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stephen King characters

Category:The Dark Tower characters is a subcategory of Category:Stephen King characters. Categorizing Dark Tower characters in both is redundant and adds clutter. –Pomte 02:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That, and most of them already have DEFAULTSORT tags, so you don't need to put that into the category anymore. Please clean-up the mess. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 12:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rune Magic

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rune Magic, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 17:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mary Jackson (Stephen King)

I have nominated Mary Jackson (Stephen King), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Jackson (Stephen King). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. AniMate^talk 00:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've also nominated Peter Jackson (Stephen King) and Tom Billingsley for deletion. They can be found in the same deletion discussion as Mary Jackson. AniMate^talk 00:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Doomsday device. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Doomsday device, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Aladdin Sane (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Voodoo

Hi, Thanos. As you can see by my and one other editor working on Brother Voodoo, we probably need to talk out some of our differences in editing before engaging in an edit war. The basis for my edits of your material on recent events is WikiComics Project guidelines that prohibit the use of long, "blow-by-blow" plot descriptions. I would ask that you read the guidelines at WP:CMOS#PLOT and WP:CMOS#PRECISE, and that we speak again.

Please remember, Wikipedia works on consensus and guidelines, and that editors work best when we discuss our edits. Thanks, --Tenebrae (talk) 14:22, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Tak (Stephen King)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Tak (Stephen King), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://villains.wikia.com/wiki/Tak_(Stephen_King). As a copyright violation, Tak (Stephen King) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Tak (Stephen King) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tak (Stephen King) and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Tak (Stephen King) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tak (Stephen King).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 21:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seth Garin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seth Garin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Garin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 16:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alien Intelligence

The article Alien Intelligence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-term unreferenced-but-to-primary-sources article with no indication of any notability or importance outside of the fictional universe.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gan (Stephen King) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gan (Stephen King) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gan (Stephen King) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13 Sins

Hi there. I saw that you recently expanded the plot of 13 Sins. The problem is that the plot summary of film articles is supposed to be between 400 and 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT. Your additions pushed it over to 800 words, which is too detailed. The best way to write a film plot summary is to stick to the basic essentials. When you try to explain minor plot points or scenes irrelevant to the main plot, you get bogged down with too much detail and the reader loses interest. There are more guidelines and information at WP:PLOTSUM and MOS:PLOT. You might want to check them out. There are also helpful guides to writing better at User:Tony1/How to improve your writing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ini (Stephen King)

The article Ini (Stephen King) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not WP:NOTABLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thanos777. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thanos777. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thanos777. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alien Intelligence (Palladium Books)

The article Alien Intelligence (Palladium Books) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, original research essay since 2007. This would be appropriate for a gaming blog, not an encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Old Ones (Palladium Books)

The article Old Ones (Palladium Books) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, original research essay since 2007. Good for a gaming blog, less so an encyclopedia entry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alien Intelligence (Palladium Books) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alien Intelligence (Palladium Books), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Intelligence (Palladium Books) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]