Jump to content

User talk:Tham153

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm a retired astronomer, and have been bouncing around adding or editing mostly astronomy-related articles, including adding several prominent astronomers' bios, as well as several entries related to Staten Island and a couple other things I think I know.Tham153 02:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todt Hill

[edit]

Thanks for the additions on Todt Hill - I lived at the top of the hill at St. Francis in the early 1970s when it was a Franscisan/Lutheran ecumenical high school - the views from the top floor are fantastic! Revmoran 20:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Changing The Times

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Changing The Times, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 02:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you originally translated this article from the German Wikipedia, I thought you might like to have a look at it now... Astronomische Nachrichten. Maybe it can be translated back again? Carcharoth 04:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a bang up job. I hope someone whose German is better than mine can put it into the German version. I can translate out of German, and hold brief conversations, but translating articles into German, no way! Tham153 (talk) 05:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Have a look at 1356 Basel earthquake for another translation. Haven't tried to expand that yet, but there are some nice links to German sources on the talk page. Carcharoth (talk) 05:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Armand Spitz

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Armand Spitz, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Eyu100(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team) 03:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas William Hamilton

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thomas William Hamilton, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 04:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Thomas William Hamilton

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Thomas William Hamilton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas William Hamilton. Thank you. Joebengo (talk) 18:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, great start! Bearian (talk) 02:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Mulizi

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mulizi, has been proposed to be merged into another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do you have a minute to come back and help figure out how to handle this article?Elan26 (talk) 20:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Elan26[reply]

AfD nomination of Thomas Wm. Hamilton

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Thomas Wm. Hamilton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Wm. Hamilton. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some people enjoy creating things, others get pleasure from destruction. I'm sure that whatever you think you are doing, that you are having fun.Tham153 (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you take a look at my userpage and the list of articles I have created I think you will be able to see which one I am doing. I take no pleasure in destruction and have often opposed those who obviously do, but I do not wish to see Wikipedia flooded with articles on individuals who have no evidential value of particular notability (which is most of us). Writing articles about yourself is not generally a good idea. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Lorenzo Da Ponte. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Goochelaar (talk) 22:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC) What is promotional about noting a fictive use of an historical character? Would you call a mention of Jesus in the website for Christ Stopped at Eboli promotional for the book or the Catholic Church? If I ever get around to noting that Inwood Park figures in a major horror story written about 60 years ago by a long dead writer, is that promotional? Or do you just get your jollies deleting?Tham153 (talk) 23:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Tham153! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Karl J. Sleight - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Casa Belvedere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails to establish the notability of the subject. Claims nearly impossible to verify.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the article survives and seems to indicate that the jackass schmuck who wanted to delete was way off base. I await seeing your abject apology, but knowing what people like you are likely to do, I won't hold my breath waiting. Hard to understand how, other than for total incompetent fools, the "claims" could be "nearly impossible to verify" if you can read.Tham153 (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Your uncivil comments are not welcome at Wikipedia. I proposed the article for deletion because there was insufficient information posted to indicate its notability at that time. Since that time, information has been added which indicates the subject's inclusion on the NRHP, which pretty much automatically indicates its notability. Had this information been in the article at the time I proposed deletion, I would not have done so, as the subject now clearly meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

I don't feel your reply is an apology, just an admission of inadequate research/understanding. And I do not feel my remarks were uncivil, but entirely appropriate for someone performing inappropriately and badly. Sorry, however, that you are so sensitive about being called to rights. Maybe in the future you will tryn to knoe more about what you are about to destroyTham153 (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You might want to read this article about being civil in discussions on Wikipedia. Thank you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WikiProject Space member! A discussion has been started regarding the future of WikiProject Space here; any comments you might have would be welcome! There are mainly two competing ideas:

  1. Centralize all the Space-related WikiProjects, such as Astronomy and Spaceflight, and merge them into WikiProject Space, or
  2. Separate the Astronomy and Spaceflight "sides" of WikiProject, and remove WikiProject Space.

If you can think of other options, that's great too. Your contribution to the discussion would be much appreciated. Thanks! :)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Space at 00:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Asteroid 11441 Anadiego, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eccentricity and Period (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 6433 Enya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AU, Eccentricity and Period (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited (8018) 1990 SW, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eccentricity and Period (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 17601 Sheldonschafer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eccentricity and Peoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Realkyhick. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User:Realkyhick that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, You are not allowed to post anything at all on a user's personal page without that user's permission. Furthermore, your strident and sarcastic tone indicates a personal attack on an editor, which is not allowed on any page under any circumstances. Please cease and desist, or you will be blocked. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

(31088) 1997 BV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to AU, Eccentricity, Period and Degrees

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Committee for a Nuclear Free Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stapleton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meanings of minor planet names: 17001–18000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Middle Atlantic Planetarium Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 19:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Tham153. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John E. Mullally

[edit]

Hello, Tham153. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "John E. Mullally".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]