User talk:Thalia14
Welcome!
Hello, Thalia14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
"I find television very educational. The minute somebody turns it on, I go to the library and read a good book." - Groucho Marx
--Thalia14 (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I read about your interest in this article. Although Wikipedia is neutral, that does not mean it is censored. What neutral means is that Wikipedia gives both the GOOD and the BAD, not that it avoids either. Please do not remove well sourced edits that criticize the book. Good policies for you to read are WP:UNDUE, WP:NOTCENSORED, WP:RS. You may also be interested in Wikipedia:BOOK, a Wikiproject for books. Thanks.--TParis00ap (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Your edits to this page violate our policies on neutral point of view and have been reverted accordingly. Please do not continue unless you gain consensus on the talk page for your edits. Auntie E. 00:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
According to our policies, NPOV does NOT mean every article will be half-nice, half-critical. It does mean that relevant opinions will be given due weight. Our articles reflect the scientific point of view when it comes to articles on science. The overwhelming scientific consensus is that evolution is well-supported and that intelligent design and creationism are not science. This is sourced. It would be misleading to our readers to imply that Well's ideas have any validity in the scientific community outside the fringes. There are millions of biologists who accept evolution. Three out of millions supporting means nothing. It's misleading to our readers to imply otherwise. Others have shown you the relevant policy pages. Please read them. See WP:NPOV, WP:DUE WP:FRINGE especially. Auntie E. 01:31, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I have responded to you on my talk page. I will repeat here what I said there: please take this to the article talk page. I see you have posted a request for comment. First thing anyone on that board will tell you is to take it to the talk page. Auntie E. 00:23, 28 October 2009 (UTC)