User talk:Thakurela

January 2015

Hello, I'm Mahensingha. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jat people because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The article is in good shape presently. Please do not make it ill-informative. Use information from reliable sources only. Unwanted edits may warrant some edit sanctions on you. Mahi (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 07:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Jat people, you may be blocked from editing. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 08:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jat people

You can see here about how to add sources Wikipedia:Citing sources. What is wrong with your edits ? Ans: The sources already existing in the article show Jat people to be farmers (not warrior or ruler). So until you can bring new sources. Stop changing the article. This is your final warning. If you again changed it without providing any new sources, you will be blocked from editing. Also see WP:NLT, making legal threats on WP is not allowed, however since you are new, I will ignore your error for once. Don't repeat it. --Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 08:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jat people. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.
Note that you may be blocked for edit warring if you repeatedly revert edits even without violating the 24 hour 3 revert rule.--regentspark (comment) 15:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raja Amani Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raja Amani Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Amani Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mahensingha _Talk 19:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]