Jump to content

User talk:Th3l4nt3rn716/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What I Changed

[edit]
  • I have taken out the content under the lead section and rewritten it,but I still need to add to it and cite some sentences.
  • I have taken out the jigsaw implementation section and rewritten it as "Origninal Jigsaw Implementation."
  • I have taken out the benefits section and plan on implementing it under "Advantages" in my outline.
  • I have taken out the history of the jigsaw section and plan on rewriting it as "Social Context."
  • I have taken out the pros and cons section and plan on rewriting it as "Advantages" and "Disadvantages."

I have also converted one reference and plan on adding and converting more references to cover the sections I kept from the original article.JAShelton (talk) 17:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Josh, you have a comprehensive approach to upgrading the jigsaw classroom Wikipedia page, but it looks like there are quite a few gaps still to fill. I don't want to push this source on you, but it's short and might have an idea or two for you to consider:

http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/pse2011/vol1/39.%20Jigsaw.pdf

Dperkins16 (talk) 01:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is my updated final draft

[edit]

It is titled "Attempt to Clean Up" on the talk page of Jigsaw Classroom

[edit]

I am removing a few things, but am rewriting a few. I have rewritten the lead section, steps for implementation, and the historical context. I have taken away pros and cons, benefits, outside of the classroom use, and the examples. The examples are not needed because the contemporary research are examples. This is for a class project and I would appreciate any feedback to point me in the right direction. The main important change is that I put in and cited all sources that I used and the original article used corresponding to the information kept and added to the article.JAShelton (talk) 19:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


What you contributed looks very good, Josh. As I wrote you in an email just now, I'd like you to provide a reference readers can consult for the Perkins & Tagler article, which can be found at:

http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/pse2011/vol1/39.%20Jigsaw.pdf

Dperkins16 (talk) 17:47, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]