User talk:Th1rt3en/Archive3

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hlogo halo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hlogo halo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning users after vandalism

Hey I notice you do some good vandal-watching but it is important to warn users after they vandalize pages, as typically we can only go to AIV after they've been handed first, second, third, and fourth-level warnings. (Twinkle has some ez-warning tools if popups, doesn't) Thanks! xenocidic (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SneakySnakesBox.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SneakySnakesBox.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 14:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of official Halo series media Featured List candidate

List of official Halo series media has been nominated for Featured List status. Please comment, etc. Thanks! FightingStreet (talk) 22:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help to improve Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Hi, I noticed that you edited the article Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare recently and I am just letting you know that I plan on working on the article over the next few weeks in order to bring it up to Featured Article status. If you have time, please consider helping out with the article by improving the referencing, content, and other miscellaneous activities in order for the article to meet the standards set out at WP:WIAFA. Thanks for your time! Gary King (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Animsurvivalkit.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Animsurvivalkit.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiAdoption

Are you adopting by any chance? Ya Boi Krakerz

Nope, sorry. ^TH1RT3EN _{talk ♦ contribs} 18:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Halo 3 Talk Page

This comment is not legidament, and i'am going to bring this up to an admin of this site to discuss the changes you made thate were okay on the halo 3 talk page. Mjriley933 (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Mjriley933[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Sam Houser; Paul Eibeler; Oubangui-Chari; Lake Ella; The Matrix Revisited; Sold-Out Software; Norihiko Hibino; Karaikal; Grand theft; Epic Pinball; Mike Dailly; BMW M51; French Togoland; Mercury M-Series; Mr. Magic; ASC Games; Steve Skroce; French Sudan; Top-down perspective

Cleanup: Special effect; Morpheus (The Matrix); Pack-in game
Merge: List of Metal Gear Acid characters; Phaya Naga; Metal Gear (video game)
Add Sources: Seraph (The Matrix); Jeff Anderson; Bangle-butt
Wikify: Rock-A-Doodle; Compositing; List of All Grown Up! episodes
Expand: Rush (video game series); Snatcher; Vientiane

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Venture Bros template

I notice you added Dermott Fictel to Template:VentureBros, so I wonder if you might be able to answer this question. Any idea why the Dermott Fictel link works when you view the template alone, but when the template appears in some but not all of the articles, the link is red? It's red in Brock Samson, Pete White, The Monarch, Doctor Girlfriend, Baron Werner Ünderbheit, Team Venture, Order of the Triad, Guild of Calamitous Intent, Doc Hammer, J. G. Thirlwell, and List of The Venture Bros. episodes. I'm baffled, myself. -- AvatarMN (talk) 20:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism in Duke Nukem Forever section (Image:dnf1.jpg|Duke Nukem Forever artwork)

The title image in the infobox is doctored. The reflection on the character's glasses has been altered. Please revert it back to the original. Nongame (talk) 10:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trigun: The Planet Gunsmoke

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Trigun: The Planet Gunsmoke, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. G.A.S

Cat

I don't think the category Cybercrime is appropriate, as no individual or individuals have yet to be convicted of any cybercrime. What do you think? Cirt (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At present it is still being included [1]. I think the consensus about using categories in this manner only after a conviction of a related crime has been established based on prior discussions at the talk page Category talk:American criminals. What is your take? Cirt (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only source referring to them as such is the Church of Scientology and their associated representatives. Cirt (talk) 05:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, it is. Cirt (talk) 05:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]