User talk:Thắng L.Đ.Q.

Welcome!

Hello, Thắng L.Đ.Q., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 15:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Octavia (gens), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaius Memmius. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Please use the WP:Edit summary box, tx! --Francis Schonken (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Appius Junius Silanus

added a link pointing to Decimus Junius Silanus

Gaius Junius Silanus

added a link pointing to Decimus Junius Silanus

Julia Caesaris (youngest sister of Julius Caesar)

added a link pointing to Decimus Junius Silanus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karma (Croatian band)

The article Karma (Croatian band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (music bands) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lesser Key of Solomon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Francis Barrett, Oriens and Egin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emperor Yang of Sui, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yang Hao and Yang Yong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About the descendants of Octavia the Younger

Hello, searching about Wikipedia, I happened to notice that this article had a fairly detailed family tree of Octavia's descendants. If my reading on Roman history is correct, the 16 generations linking her to Melania the Younger is unprecedented -- the next longest I am aware of is the genealogical tree involving Valentinian III, which is about half that. And it is especially surprising, for many authorities believe few Senatorial families from the 1st century AD survived into the 2nd, let alone any from Republican times; this would make this genealogical lineage unique! However, looking at the sources & the articles on the individuals in this lineage, I found that the parental links were frequently qualified; that is, the word "possibly" appears a lot. This indicates that these links are theories based on shared names & known Roman naming practice. Further, the Romans of the 4th century (when Melania & her parents lived) were very conscious of status & their ancestors, & if they could trace their ancestry to the sister of Augustus, they would proudly boast of it. Unless there is some primary source that explicitly states one is the son/daughter of another, combining such a long lineage based on theories & opinions is not a verifiable fact, but original research.

In short, I fear you have accidentally represented a combination of opinions as fact & combining opinions don't necessarily result in a fact. While this family tree may, indeed exist, it is equally likely that one or more of these links didn't exist -- & thus there is no connection between the two women. It's hard not to believe that this table should be removed as being misleading due to at best being original research, & at worse just plain wrong. Thoughts? -- llywrch (talk) 19:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your notice. I've already reread it and found that the family tree turned out to be too convenient, seems like someone already made it to link between Melanie and Octavia to the ancestor-descendant relation. I agree that the unreliable generations need to be removed from Octavia's descendants. Have you thought about which generation was the beginning of this "possibly" family tree? – Thắng L.Đ.Q. (talk) 08:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You mean to where Octavia's descendants can be traced? Or to where Melania's ancestors? If the first, I'd be surprised if any of her descendants could be traced into the 2nd century -- although it's possible. Based on the sources provided, Ronald Syme is a reliable source & not to be questioned; if he can show that Octavia had provable descendants to a certain point, I'd believe it. On the other hand if it is a case where shared names make it likely, I'd merely state that "Syme argues that..." & leave it at that. Looking at the puzzle from Melania's end, having read a few scholarly articles over the last few nights I found that there is no certain proof of her ancestry beyond her parents or (at most) grandparents; Romans of that time liked to boast of their distant ancestors, but rarely mentioned their grandparents or earlier ancestors. Getting to the bottom of this matter is not a quick project, & you & I may never finish it ourselves.

But as for the changes you made, I think those were the reasonable & probably the right choices. The point is not to deny the possibility -- especially if someone with reasonable reliability (or notoriety) has expressed it -- that the two are related. It's to remind the reader that it is a theory or opinion, not a solid fact. -- llywrch (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yingchuan Xun clan family tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fan Ye. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quintus Fabius Maximus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrician. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yingchuan Xun clan family tree

The article Yingchuan Xun clan family tree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost all of these individuals are non notable and no reason at all for this chart. Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and failure to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 04:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LGBT themes in classical mythology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juno. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Rodman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hillary Rodman. Since you had some involvement with the Hillary Rodman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thắng L.Đ.Q.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Great job on creating the family trees! 損齋 (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thắng L.Đ.Q.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thắng L.Đ.Q.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qian Chu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nanyang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Drusus Cladius Nero (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Drusus Cladius Nero (disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 11#Drusus Cladius Nero (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ★Trekker (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drusus Cladius Nero (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Drusus Cladius Nero (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. (t · c) buidhe 21:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Valerius Maximus Basilius for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valerius Maximus Basilius, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerius Maximus Basilius until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]