User talk:Teutonicdeveloper

Welcome!

Hello, Teutonicdeveloper, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Teutonicdeveloper, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Teutonicdeveloper

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Teutonicdeveloper, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://teutonicorder.byethost24.com/History.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and conflict of interest

Thank you for your interest in creating an article for an organization on Wikipedia. There are multiple problems with your submission. You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia even if you are the copyright holder, unless special licensing permissions are in place. In short, a copyright owner cannot offer Wikipedia a one-time license for use. Rather, the copyright to the material has to be released – permanently and irrevocably – into the public domain or under a free copyright license that is compatible with Wikipedia's licenses. This is because Wikipedia aims to be freely distributable and copyable by anyone, so all content must be licensed for that purpose. You can learn more about this policy at Wikipedia:Copyrights.

The second problem is conflict of interest. Writing an article about your own organization or that of a client is strongly discouraged, as it is difficult to maintain the required neutral point of view.

If you'd like to use the copyrighted content in an article, you can follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission on how to obtain the proper licensing. If you are the copyright holder, refer to Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for how to grant us permission to use your content. Alternatively, you could write a new article that does not closely paraphrase the material available online.However you would then still have to abide by the conflict of interest guideline. In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

I'm sorry this message could not be more favourable. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (It is the Official Information for THE TEUTONIC KNIGHTS HISTORICAL EMPIRE OF ST.MARY HOSPITAL FROM JERUSALEM , MAIN HEAD OFFICE AT MEDIEVAL FORTRES MAGNUS VARADINUM (ACTUAL CITY ORADEA)- TRANSYLVANIA - ROMANIA.

Please, the website in links is our own, and history is accurate is it comes directly from the archives of THE TEUTONIC KNIGHTS HISTORICAL EMPIRE OF ST.MARY HOSPITAL FROM JERUSALEM , MAIN HEAD OFFICE AT MEDIEVAL FORTRES MAGNUS VARADINUM (ACTUAL CITY ORADEA)- TRANSYLVANIA - ROMANIA. And it is histrical facts I am giving, I am not being biest in any way! Kindest Regards . Barron of The Teuonic Knights Historical Empire of St. Mary's Hospital from Jerusalem) --Teutonicdeveloper (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Teutonicdeveloper: As was stated in the original message, you cannot post your own copyrighted material on Wikipedia unless you follow the proper procedure to donate the material. Doing so releases it under a license which allows anyone to copy and adapt it for their own use, even commercially. Please also be aware that for any page you create on Wikipedia, you have no right of ownership or editorial control.

Wikipedia articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. Your own website is a valid primary source, but it lacks the required independence to demonstrate that this topic is notable enough for inclusion. Wikipedia is uninterested in what an organization says about itself. However, if you can cite sources that are unaffiliated with this organization, then there is a better chance of its notability being established.

Writing about an organization you belong to compromises your ability to write about it from the required neutral point of view, which is why we discourage people from doing it. You should leave the writing up to others who have no vested interest in the topic. Please consult our plain and simple conflict of interest guide for more information. Also, if you are in a paid position with this organization and intend to write about it, you must disclose this fact per the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use and Wikipedia's policy on paid editing.

Finally, the page you wrote on was your user page. User pages are not encyclopedia articles, nor are they workspaces for draft articles in progress. They are meant as a brief biographical profile of you, the editor, and your Wikimedia-related activities. The userpage guidelines have details about what type of content is considered acceptable on there. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 15:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]