User talk:Testosterenbom

Welcome!

Hello, Testosterenbom, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pal Sun Nyo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wikishovel (talk) 14:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pal Sun Nyo

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pal Sun Nyo, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 14:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add potentially controversial content to Wikipedia without references to reliable sources to substantiate the statements yo make. This is especially important if the content contains accusations against any living persons. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A question about other accounts

Have you used any other account or accounts? If so, what accounts have you used? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have used other accounts but I don't remember the names. One of them was a randomly generated string with a length of 32. Testosterenbom (talk) 17:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

jordan barrett

hey im chadcel on lookism Sub 5 autist birdcel (talk) 00:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hell! I hope you are able to find a place here at Wikipedia. A good start would be to understand that social media posts are not considered reliable sources and that Biographies of living persons require multiple, strong references for and contentious information. --Mark Miller (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of fact, social media posts are (sometimes, sometimes not) considered reliable sources. WP:USINGPRIMARY states that we can use a person's website as a primary source. Since someone's personal twitter is only curated by that person, that is also to be considered "a personal website. It is also in accordance with WP:TWITTER. As long as we don't base the article solely on twitter posts, we are fine. I will revert back. Testosterenbom (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Lord Our Righteousness Church, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Lord Our Righteousness Church. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my own commentary. Testosterenbom (talk) 01: 08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Lord Our Righteousness Church, you may be blocked from editing. —Non-Dropframe _talk 01:09, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not editing disruptively. I am contributing in good faith. I will add sources for my edits. You have broken Wikipedia guidelines by assuming bad faith. Testosterenbom (talk) 01: 12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lord Our Righteousness Church. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not editing disruptively. I am contributing in good faith. I will add sources for my edits. You have broken Wikipedia guidelines by assuming bad faith. Testosterenbom (talk) 01

12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Whether you are right or wrong, edit warring is not the way to resolve the issue. This is your last warning. Please take it to the talk page if you wish to discuss inclusion of controversial material. Primefac (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

February 2017

Hello, I'm 1989. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to LGBT tourism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MCMLXXXIX 00:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]