User talk:TestiniFamily

July 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2020 in film. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AJFU (talk) 14:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Not only have you failed to provide sources for much of the content you have posted, but I have also failed to find any sources, and in at least one case what you have posted is actually contradicted by a source. I have also found an example of you posting as though it were fact something which as far as I am able to determine seems to be a fantasy created by "fans" in such places as Wikia. Please make sure that everything you add to articles is supported by reliable sources. I urge you to read the guide to reliable sources before adding any more content to articles. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:54, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jumanji (2019 film)

The article Jumanji (2019 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Proposed future film with no substantial coverage yet in any significant source. The article is sourced only to IMDb, and even that does not support the content of this article: for example, the cast list is strikingly different.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of LegoKing516 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:07, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]