User talk:Tess600

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tess600. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Lukeno94! User:Tess600 22:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Tess, and well done with fixing your signature! :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:29, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The thank you section or...?

If you'd like to thank me, use this space here. But, please, no bashing.Tess600 (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC):[reply]

Stuff you'd like me to look into

I'm not perfect, but I am collaborative and respectful. If you'd like me to look into something (like citing a primary source or locating a verifiable Internet resource, book or article let me know here. Tess600 (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC):[reply]

Transparency Policy

With deference to neutrality and to make information available to the public, I hereby state that there will be no conflict of interest with Wikipedia.org and the institutions I do independent research at. Institutions who may or may not employ me are not affiliated with my contributions to wiki articles, and I act independently of them as a Wikipedia contributor in my free time.

Perimeters of Involvement

I will abide by Wikipedia's community rules/style guides and other guidelines, and will hereby contribute to Wikipedia.org where I have come across viable, authoritative sources. I am not paid by any agency to promote a person (living or dead) or article. I do not work for Wikipedia.org. I do not have friends or relatives in this organization. Any repository, resource material, library, museum, cultural heritage site I cite as a source is truly an accessible and authoritative source. I hold myself accountable for any disinformation I disseminate and on my talk page, please address it so I can make any edits that are found not to be correct.

Anti-discrimination & Good Faith Statement

I will not engage in activity of vandalism, racism, sexism and ageism. For the sake of neutrality, I do not try to disclose or promote any political affiliations. I respect everyone's right to privacy.

Sincerely, Me Tess600 (talk) 05:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Log of Minor Edits

September 2015 on: --Henry Regnery papers link in References only links to Stanford's main catalog page and not a persistent link that can be found on the OAC (Online Archives of California). Changed the link to take the reader directly to Regnery's finding aid which is a descriptive "catalog" that talks about what is in the collection. No conflict of interest since I did not process the collection and I am no longer affiliated with the Hoover Institution. Just want to give proper credit to a persistent link that would be more useful: ^[1]

2015: --William R. Gruber --Edmund Gruber

2014: --van den Keere --Edmund Gruber

2013: --van den Keere

URL UPDATES --Tess600 (talk) 16:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Tess600 --> Updated URL for Henry Regnery article. Old URL pointed to Stanford's OPAC whereas new link points to a persistent URL that is found on the OAC. See, "September 2015 on" entry at the top.[reply]

^ http://www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt9v19q4s4/

[1] ttp://www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt9v19q4s4/

[1]