User talk:Teslaedit17

Proposed deletion of RF Nitro Communications

Hello, Teslaedit17

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, RF Nitro Communications, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the RF Nitro Communications page to apply to wiki guidance. While the content created may seem trivial 20 years later, at the time the products this company was making were considered novel and ground breaking and apparently were game changing enough for the company to get bough out within a year.

The company's importance is to show a link in company products and the evolution of RF Nitro's ideas that can be follow up to products that Qorvo is selling at this moment. Albeit, the smaller company article is so short as they were absorbed into larger and larger companies. Had RF Nitro bought as many companies as Qorvo, then the RF Nitro article would be a bit longer and broader, but as it stands, I wanted to give the picture of a company with an innovation process it's credit for what it could achieve at the time. Teslaedit17 (talk) 11:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further consideration, I was able to merge the minuscule contributions of RF Nitro into the RFMD article. Great call as a non-existent company that only existed for one year would hardly be expanded in the future. Please delete the RF Nitro wiki article if you can. Otherwise, it will lapse in a few days. Teslaedit17 (talk) 02:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teslaedit17, you know, you can remove PROD tags if you disagree with the deletion tagging. And, after a PROD'd article has been deleted, you can go to WP:REFUND and request its restoration. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am learning the commands, etc. behind the wiki. In this case, I have conceded, but may remove the PROD tags on future articles. Teslaedit17 (talk) 23:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Odyssey semiconductor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Odyssey semiconductor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Drafted as the company might be notable per Google searches, but as it stands the article failed to show the notability of the company. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3d GaN architecture enabling higher breakdown voltage is the notability of the companies products. I will add such reference. Teslaedit17 (talk) 10:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Thank you for your work adding new content to Wikipedia. Not all topics are notable (suitable for a stand-alone Wikipedia article). An article you created does not cite sources establishing notability, so it may get deleted. A source shows that the article topic is notable when it:

contains significant coverage: it addresses the topic directly and in multiple paragraphs of detail. A source with only trivial or off-topic mentions of the subject doesn't count.
is a reliable source: it has a reliable publication process, or a suitable expert author (look up the reliability of common sources, or discuss). Newspapers and books usually meet this criteria, company and personal websites usually do not.
is independent of the subject: it isn't produced by the article's subject or someone similarly affiliated with it. For example, these are not independent: the subject's press releases, autobiographies, website, and interviews.

If you can find notability-establishing sources, please add them: more than one is needed unless the applicable subject-specific notability guideline states otherwise. Specific questions can be answered live at the Teahouse help forum. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Odyssey semiconductor has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Odyssey semiconductor. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odyssey semiconductor (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odyssey semiconductor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teslaedit17! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Odyssey semiconductor

Hello, Teslaedit17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Odyssey semiconductor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Dosimetry

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dosimetry, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Odyssey semiconductor

Hello, Teslaedit17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Odyssey semiconductor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Dosimetry

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dosimetry, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]