Jump to content

User talk:Teryx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page!

If you leave a message, I will most likely respond here rather than on your page (unless you ask me to respond elsewhere). Thanks!

Welcome, from Journalist

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Teryx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Journalist C./ Holla @ me!

Ottawa U Table Format

[edit]

Hello. Please update Carleton University's table format as well. It would be nice if table formats for all universities and colleges in Ottawa are consistent. Thanks! sikander 20:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

University Table Format

[edit]

I don't agree with the info box changes you're making in the various university articles. Some of the boxes already there are much better than what you're placing there. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 02:05, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Already wikified?

[edit]

Those three articles you removed the wikify tag from are not already wikified. For example, the lists on 1985 Wimbledon Championships - Men's Singles need to be turned into a table. ~MDD4696 15:27, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be more specific, 1985 Wimbledon Championships - Men's Singles, 1985 French Open - Women's Singles and 1985 French Open - Men's Singles. ~MDD4696 15:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the lists looked okay, but I've restored the "wikify" tags to those pages. Teryx 17:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the message, Hraefen. (Teryx 17:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Your edit to Reform of the United Nations Security Council

[edit]

Simply excellent. Keep up the good work. Respectfully, Republitarian 23:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on UN

[edit]

Many thanks, Buffa. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Buffadren (talkcontribs) 08:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Nice cleanup on Porter Goss.

[edit]

Thanks! Goss, I'm afraid, was one of the more disastrous appointments to CIA. Raborn, while completely unqualified as an intelligence director and superb as an engineering manager, at least seemed to recognize it. McCone was the engineering manager that made the transition; I regard him as one of the best.

Goss seems to have had the infighting ideas of Schlesinger and Turner, and that just doesn't work at CIA. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 04:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain more fully?

[edit]

So, where do you think it belongs? [1] Geo Swan (talk) 13:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Research survey invitation

[edit]

Greetings Teryx-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 18:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]