User talk:Tertulius/sandbox/Guerrilla filmmaking

Tag

Should we have a tag on this page, and if so should it be classified? Since it's just a redirect.... in the meantime back to stub --24.97.179.166 13:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've NA'd it since it's currently a redirect. I should note, however, that the correct spelling of the first word is guerrilla (two r's), so it's actually this title which should be the article and the other which should be the redirect. Girolamo Savonarola 18:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. IrishGuy ^talk 19:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As Arri SR3 16mm film cameras are visible during many shots in Dave Chapelle's Block Party, i removed it from the list of films shot digitally. Even if the documentary parts are, it's inclusion is misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.104.154 (talk) 12:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Guerrilla filmmaking

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Guerrilla filmmaking's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "DariusJames":

From Melvin Van Peebles: James, Darius (1995). That's Blaxploitation!: Roots of the Baadasssss 'Tude (Rated X by an All-Whyte Jury. ISBN 0-312-13192-5. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
From Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song: James, Darius (1995). That's Blaxploitation!: Roots of the Baadasssss 'Tude (Rated X by an All-Whyte Jury. ISBN 0-312-13192-5. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unnatural writing

Something is wrong with this page, it is extremely unnaturally written and requires a major cleanup. E.g. "One day, Godless Darren Aronofsky, celebrated US filmmaker, had to make his God, and his God is narrative film. Moreover, assuming that «the way to the heart is through the body», submits art to entertainment. He is certainly right with such assumption, which has been proven by modern neuroscience. Having grown up within a Jewish family, Aronofsky is affected to biblical stories. Biblical stories inspire him to make surreal and disturbing films «well known for their often violent subject matter». Almost all generate serious controversy. Aronofsky does not bother with it at all. Serious controversy helps make good money: The Wrestler, Black Swan, Noah." Christiaanjmeyer (talk) 11:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]