User talk:TerryElliotLennox
|
Proposed deletion of Nick Garrison
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nick Garrison, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Insufficient notability to warrant a discrete article per the 3 tests of WP:ENTERTAINER.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jim Ward (talk·stalk) 20:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nick Louvel
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nick Louvel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Insufficient notability to warrant an article per the 4 pertinent tests of WP:CREATIVE.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jim Ward (talk·stalk) 20:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Domino One
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Domino One. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domino One. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Nick Louvel
[edit]I have nominated Nick Louvel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Louvel (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jim Ward (talk·stalk) 04:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)