User talk:Terrillja/Archives/06/2009
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Terrillja. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Non-English pages
Hey there! Just so you know, if you come across any more pages that aren't written in English, we'd prefer they be tagged with {{notenglish}} for translation. Non-English pages don't always qualify for speedy deletion criteria such as A3, since they could just be direct copies from another language project. Thanks! Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- To be honest, all I got when I looked at it was boxes instead of characters and a few random lines of text. So I tagged it as a3 since I couldn't tell what it was supposed to be. The subject wasn't identified from what I could see. I would have tagged it as notenglish if I could have told that there were actual characters there, but my browser didn't show me.--Terrillja talk 01:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
The above article is being re-assessed as part of the GA Sweeps project The re-assessment has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass; otherwise it will fail. See Talk:James Bond for things needing to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Warning
Incorrect, Fhue is the one engaging in an edit war. When I saw he wasn't going take a hint and stand down, I did. Now look how he's showing his gratitude. — NRen2k5(TALK), 01:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, never mind; I see you've warned both of us. — NRen2k5(TALK), 01:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
what?
why did you revert my edit, I was not vandalizing, you did not give a good reason for doing so, so I shall count this as vandalizing,please tell me what you were trying to do because it looked like just randomly reverting for no reason —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffmeck22 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- You added an image which is likely a copyright violation, so I reverted it, and am going around tagging every copyrighted image that you have uploaded. So I reverted since the image you changed it to will be deleted soon enough, better to have the old image there. And "existing images are bad angles" is not a valid reason to violate copyright laws.--Terrillja talk 03:00, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Don Carlos (double sighted dog) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Don Carlos (double sighted dog). Since you had some involvement with the Don Carlos (double sighted dog) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)