User talk:Terrifictriffid

Sexual Addiction

Oops! I didn't revert far enough. Thanks for catching that one. Justinfr (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i have given my reasons on the dalit talk page check over there

my reasons are in the dalit talk page why dont you check over there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjuna316 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duh!--Buster7 (talk) 09:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT make changes without giving reasons

give reasons in the dalit section. i have already given my reasons + the reference. state ur reasons before making changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjuna316 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. What a tedious editor. I don't find words to say more than that. If he reverts again, I will undo. i.e. if I get there first!--Buster7 (talk) 03:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i have given all my reasons

all my reason are in the DALIT TALK section stop trying to show me as the villain to others. why dont you come in the dalit talk section and discuss things.

you are the cheater here not me. you are going against wikipedia policy. discuss or else leave this article alone. Arjuna316 (talk) 05:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Criticism of YouTube

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Criticism of YouTube. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of YouTube. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]