User talk:TerenceBoshy
Hi. Please see the Edit Summary for this edit. — Jeff G. ツ 01:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Editing constructively
[edit]Your first five edits, all to talk pages (WT:ITN and Talk:Iran), suggest a pattern of trolling. Please edit constructively, rather than leaving comments that add nothing to Wikipedia. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 01:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
April 2011
[edit]Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Saudi Arabia worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 02:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Saudi Arabia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 02:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Saudi Arabia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. ツ 02:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 04:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)TerenceBoshy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This Time I Really Did Not Do AnyThing Bad . TerenceBoshy (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Other than the pretty obvious trolling. You seem to indicate this isn't your first account, too. 狐 Dhéanamh ar rolla bairille! 12:41, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TerenceBoshy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry for making disruptive edits . I am not going to do it again. I will just read articles and if I have a unrelated question I will ask it on the Help Desk Or Reference Desk. TerenceBoshy (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:52, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
That Is Not Fair . I Did not know you are not allowed to create multiple accounts. TerenceBoshy (talk) 14:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
If I Am Not Going To Be Unblocked I Guess I Just Have To Wait . While I Wait I Will THink About What I Did. TerenceBoshy (talk) 14:57, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Not Fair . My Proof.
[edit]This is not fair . I have Proof. I did not see Jeff's warning sign . I was busy and then you guys randomly blocked me. Now I May Be Released From My Indefinite Block. TerenceBoshy (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
You all know I was blocked for a non proved reason. Where as you keep going to block me. Is this a joke to me?TerenceBoshy (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)