User talk:Tennessee7

Welcome!

Hello, Tennessee7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Rolene Strauss have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 05:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{help me}}

Please identify any revisions that were unsourced. I dispute this claim in the strongest terms, and question the basis for making such an implication. Simply writing undisputed facts out of existence violates Wikipedia's policy of being neutral, and this is apparently what some users are attempting to do to this article in an effort to push a personal agenda along racial lines.

The article was misleading prior to my revisions, intentionally creating the implication that the subject of the article was black through the use of intentionally misleading wording, such as "the first African," and "the first African since." These terms create unacceptable ambiguity when such terms are used in the context of beauty pageants to imply that this particular victory signifies the social progression towards widespread acceptance of differing beauty standards sought by people of African descent.

As the winner of this pageant was someone who was unambiguously white and thus associated with the customary Western standards of beauty, the wording is misleading. I added in data from existing Wikipedia pages and hyperlinked to them, including those of the last black African winner and the first black winner. Please tell me how this is making unsourced revisions.

Tennessee7 (talk) 07:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tennessee7. You have new messages at Jjj1238's talk page.
Message added 20:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

{ [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 20:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of largest palaces for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of largest palaces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest palaces until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarkisMysoe (talk) 10:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]