User talk:Tempwirk

[tmpwrk]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tempwirk! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dreamy Jazz and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Tempwirk, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Laura Ingraham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 03:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why in God's name are you adding "adopted"? What is that supposed to mean? Why don't you add "not-adopted" to others? Would you want to add method of delivery, and whether children were breastfed or not? Seriously--this is also redundant, and I consider it a BLP violation, as if you're placing an asterisk next to the children. Drmies (talk) 03:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies I did not add "adopted". An IP user removed it from the infobox a few hours ago so I re-inserted the text because it is reliably sourced in the personal life section below. Apparently it has been in the article for at least one month (didn't go back in the history further than that). I think it is fine and should remain in the infobox but it doesnt really seem like a big deal if others want it removed.Tempwirk (talk) 03:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So you didn't add it, but you did add it? And it is not fully sourced: the alleged third child was not mentioned in the source given, because that source predates the child by 2 years. So you're adding it, you're adding it against consensus, you're adding it without a supporting guideline from the template, and you're adding it without a WP:RS. Nice to clear that up. 2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 03:28, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 03:42, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 03:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]