User talk:Tempus Loquendi

July 2016

Your recent editing history at Nazi gun control theory shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grayfell (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tempus_Loquendi reported by User:Grayfell (Result: ). Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Grayfell, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 20:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Please discuss article improvement on the article talk page. Your presumptions of what my opinions may be are not relevant, nor accurate. Wikipedia is a collaborative document. We all agree to work with each other to improve this document. Edit-warring will not help you accomplish your goal, which seems focused on inserting your personal opinions into the article, rather than providing properly cited material that conforms to policy - and doing so collaboratively with your peers. Anastrophe (talk) 20:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]