User talk:Telex1

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Telex1! I am Calaka and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Calaka (talk) 08:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Before you create more articles

Can you please read the above links? An article needs at a minimum a category, a reference and it needs to be wikified. Not doing so will lead to the articles you make in getting deleted (and hence wasting your time). Thank you for your understanding.Calaka (talk) 08:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Soundtrack From A Happy Ending

The article Soundtrack From A Happy Ending has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Future albums are generally not notable and this is 'due out in late 2010.' WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clubmarx (talk) 15:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly

The article Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable, published, 3rd party sources, does not indicate encyclopedic notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-10-04t21:26z 21:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Trouble With Turner

A tag has been placed on The Trouble With Turner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 06:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Telex1! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 48 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Juan Carlos Betancourt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly

The article Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, unreleased album

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly

I have nominated Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Steamroller Assault (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have also bundled a couple of your other articles together (Soundtrack from a Happy Ending and Open Hearts (JD & Elliot)) at the same Afd. You are welcome to join the discussion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 20:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeremy Waggoner

The article Jeremy Waggoner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While a murder is tragic, this victim is does not meet notability guidelines. He is known for one event only and that is not something he did , but being a victim.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 13:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Justice For Jeremy

The article Justice For Jeremy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organization. Some coverage exists, but not enough to meet notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 13:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jeremy Waggoner

I have nominated Jeremy Waggoner, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Waggoner. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 20:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Justice For Jeremy

I have nominated Justice For Jeremy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice For Jeremy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 20:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Justice For Jeremy‎. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Neither of the articles are pertinent to the investigation. No one is interfering with the investigation by saying that the articles do not belong. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 03:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Please do not make personal attacks against other editors. Thanks. Hairhorn (talk) 21:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Frankie Turner

A tag has been placed on Frankie Turner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 02:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juan Carlos Betancourt

The article Juan Carlos Betancourt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography which fails WP:CREATIVE as it stands.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rodhull andemu 17:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremy Waggoner

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jeremy Waggoner, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 08:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly

A tag has been placed on Only Enemies Tell The Truth... Friends And Lovers Lie Endlessly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 08:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Karyadi Sutedja

I have nominated Karyadi Sutedja, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karyadi Sutedja. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Toddst1 (talk) 08:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Gurry, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. This is not the way to proceed. If you think this article should not be here, please nominate for deletion rather than blanking, which is vandalism. Rodhull andemu 16:29, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Michael Gurry

An article that you have been involved in editing, Michael Gurry, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Gurry. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Yappy2bhere (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Broadzilla-1996-cassette.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Broadzilla-1996-cassette.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Masquerade Of The Red Death, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Esmeralda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bizarchestra, La Bas, Jade Ashekerra, Jennabelle 'Wingless' Feuer perform in The Blue Room.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bizarchestra, La Bas, Jade Ashekerra, Jennabelle 'Wingless' Feuer perform in The Blue Room.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Masquerade of the Red Death

Hello Telex1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Masquerade of the Red Death for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Whispe ring 16:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Broadzilla-1996-cassette.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Broadzilla-1996-cassette.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]