User talk:Teh hackz0r

Hello, Teh hackz0r, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 20:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Golden Dawn (Greece). Section "Allegations of Nazism".

Hi Teh hackz0r! I added (20:47, 23 June 2012‎) a paragraph in the section "Allegations of Nazism" which you removed as "unencyclopedic" (11:06, 24 June 2012‎). It would be great if you could explain why you removed it. Black Hole GR (talk) 11:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I removed it because it was not written in an encyclopedic manner (see MOS:NOTED). If you reformulate it in neutral language, I have no objections against it. Regards Teh hackz0r (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I re-wrote it in a neutral language. Kind Regards. Black Hole GR (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

British Israelism

Hello Teh hackz0r.

I see that you have made some comments in relation to the above article, comments which I think are relevant to the situation at hand, so I am contacting you to request any input you may be able to contribute.

The situation at hand is that I made what I felt were some basic edits, and they were repeatedly deleted by a contributor, even after I made an adjustment.

I am basically new to this scenario, so I hadn't been aware of the Talk page, etc. At any rate, I have been reading the talk page, and the content of my edit had already been largely addressed by other contributors, including yourself.

So, since I am tackling the deplorable state of the article in question and intend to do a significant edit, I would like to try and build a little consensus, and the more the merrier in the that process!

I would appreciate it if you could take the time to read through the recent entries on the Talk page and participate in the course of events leading to as substantial an edit as possible.

Thanks. Ubikwit (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Ubikwit[reply]