User talk:Tegic

January 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tegic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tegic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please un block me, I had a new trainee working on promoting our company, it's very clear he has done the wrong thing, I understand how Wikipedia works and I have given him a stern talking too.. I can insure you that this page will be constructive.. You have my honest word, it's a great source of reference and should be used only for constructive posts.. Very understandable. I hope we can get our account re instated, jay 0431404607 thanks Tegic (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Furthermore, accounts are not to be shared accounts. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 04:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it's me who blocked you.

Thank you for your politeness in what must be a trying situation. I'll suppose that everything you say is true. One part of it is: I hope we can get our account re instated. In the context, it's pretty clear that you want a corporate account. However, no, you may not have one. Neither may you have an account that you share with anybody else. Moreover, even with a new username (just for yourself, not shared with anyone), you should think very hard about making even constructive edits to an article on your own company: please read/see this on the matter. -- Hoary (talk) 11:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]