User talk:Tedweverka

Lataster

Most of the content found in the following:

Lataster, Raphael (2014). "The Fourth Quest: A Critical Analysis of the Recent Literature on Jesus' (a)Historicity". Literature & Aesthetics. 24 (1): 1–28. ISSN 2200-0437.
Lataster, Raphael (2014). "Richard Carrier: On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014; pp. xiv + 696". Journal of Religious History. 38 (4): 614–616.
Lataster, Raphael (2015). "Questioning the Plausibility of Jesus Ahistoricity Theories – A Brief Pseudo-Bayesian Metacritique of the Sources". Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies. 6 (1): 63–96. ISSN 2155-1723.
Lataster, Raphael (2015). Jesus Did Not Exist: A Debate Among Atheists. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 978-1-5148-1442-0. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Lataster, Raphael (2016). "Review Essay: Bart Ehrman and the Elusive Historical Jesus". Literature & Aesthetics. 26 (1): 181–192. ISSN 2200-0437.
Lataster, Raphael (2016b). "It's Official: We Can Now Doubt Jesus' Historical Existence". Think. 15 (43): 65–79. doi:10.1017/S1477175616000117.
Lataster, Raphael (2019). "Defending Jesus Agnosticism". Think. 18 (51): 77–91. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help) doi:10.1017/S1477175618000362.

Can also be found in:

Lataster, Raphael (2019). Questioning the Historicity of Jesus: Why a Philosophical Analysis Elucidates the Historical Discourse. Brill-Rodopi. ISBN 978-9004397934.

--2db (talk) 16:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hi Tedweverka! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 23:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Content disputes can be very taxing and I hope that recent conflicts have not caused undue distress or discouraged you from contributing. Most of us are volunteers and in my experience, it is often not worth engaging if you are not having fun. Take a look at WP:RNO! 15 (talk) 00:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Historicity of Jesus

You may recall posting this on the Talk page of The Historicity of Jesus: "This page doesn't read like an encyclopedia entry, but more like a defense of a viewpoint that is so vociferous it exposes an insecurity of the viewpoint's proponents." I agree, and have decided to correct some of this bias if I can. I have started with something small and unexceptionable, but already I am being subjected to this bias. Take a look, if you want some entertainment, and if you want to put your oar in, please do so. Brymor (talk) 17:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]