User talk:Tedkaczynski69

Write anything here. Any engagement is fine.

I'm putting this in a section so I can write comfortably above it / resolved issues with name

Since you seem to be generally contributing in good faith, and have been for a few months, instead of giving you a template warning or outright blocking you I'd like to strongly suggest that you request to have your username changed, as your current name seems like one others would find disruptive, which violates Wikipedia's username policy. That could well help you avoid problems down the line. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan! I saw your message on my talk page and I understand the concern. I know that my name is the same as the Unabomber's, but it is also my real name. The "69" (which some may deem inappropriate) comes from my uncle's year of birth. If it is still a concern, even though it is my real name, I'll be (reluctantly) willing to change. I did not have malice when I made the account and also assumed it would pass because this is my given name and I could just explain it like this. Thanks! Ted (talk) 08:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I half expected you to say something like that because it would be about the only way you could be editing like that and not be a vandal. Well, we do have a way to handle situations like yours. You (or I on your behalf if you find initiating the process too daunting) can start a request for comment on your username, where a group of people could decide whether we should allow it, and you can make your (ahem) case freely. Would you like to do that?

BTW, here's where you can go to learn how to do signatures. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way that you could initiate it and also have me get the notifications too? If not I'm willing to do it on my own. Ted (talk) 07:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did; I've just been a little distracted over the last couple of days. Will do soon. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi, you're invited to an RfC discussion regarding Bruno Bettelheim article

Hello,

As a relatively recent contributor to the article, you're invited to a Request for Comment (RfC) discussion. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 17:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bruno_Bettelheim#rfc_7DDF8CC

Thanks for inviting me. I left my opinion for consideration. Ted (talk) 14:09, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

S v Melani

Hi. This was a good many years ago now. My source would have been the case itself. Here's a decent overview: https://books.google.co.za/books?id=_VGlNH1beKQC&pg=PA210&lpg=PA210&dq=%22S+v+Melani%22&source=bl&ots=a8pOtxc562&sig=ACfU3U3AD3MpA5F6G81M6wQZONHNFngSCA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjBsYinrZDmAhU6RhUIHdQCAj0Q6AEwB3oECEYQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22S%20v%20Melani%22&f=false Crusoe (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ted (talk) 23:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, invite to join new RfC on Bruno Bettelheim

Hi, thanks for participating in last May's RfC (Request for Comment).

I wish to invite you to join a new one with the specific question of:

Should our lead sentence describe Bettelheim as a "self-proclaimed psychologist"?

RfC on lead sentence

started: Feb. 25, 2020

Any time and effort you wish to spend on this will be most appreciated. Thanks. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 01:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FriendlyRiverOtter. Sorry for not responding – I haven't been using Wikipedia much recently. Even if I could respond when it was reasonable to do so, I probably wouldn't because I would not call myself an expert on Bettelheim. My work on Wikipedia is mostly correcting grammar and ensuring consistency. My primary source on Bettelheim was the article itself, so I wouldn't feel right producing an informed opinion. I applaud your effort on this article, though. Thanks for inviting me. Do well! Ted (talk) 07:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Suicide note (book)

Hello, Tedkaczynski69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Suicide note".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]