User talk:TedThompsonHater106
May 2016
[edit]This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tightwad Teddy
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tightwad Teddy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikipelli Talk 11:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the end of your user talk page.
TedThompsonHater106 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Not a bad username. I'm starship9000 block and tag lets go --TedThompsonHater106 (talk) 11:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is a nonsense request. You have the choice of choosing a sensible username or staying blocked. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Sounds like an admission of being a sock of User:Starship9000. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- You nailed it brother. I am starship9000, a confirmed sock, not suspected, confirmed. Tag me, User:Call me Randall, user:David Comalli, user:McHeaduphisbutt (locked=yes), user:Rschen7756 and user:Atta way cobby. Me and the accounts I mentioned are starship9000 socks (confirmed). Yes it is a admission. Please tag them Boing I believe in you. --TedThompsonHater106 (talk) 15:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)