User talk:Techwritar

MrWalkinLick moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MrWalkinLick, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Newslinger talk 02:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, I have requested that the page should be deleted since I can't find any new sources to add.(Techwritar (talk) 06:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Techwritar, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Techwritar, good luck, and have fun. — Newslinger talk 02:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Techwritar, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 02:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a possible conflict of interest

Hello, Techwritar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for this, I appreciate and I don't have any personal relationship with the subjects I write about Techwritar (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toks Asher Young for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toks Asher Young is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toks Asher Young until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Onsight Deeda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onsight Deeda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onsight Deeda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:48, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blessing Williams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blessing Williams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blessing Williams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of King Cid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King Cid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Cid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Serial Number 54129

Hello, Techwritar. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2020_January_14.
Message added 18:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please fill in your reason where I have indicated and then deleted my capitalised sentence. ——SN 54129 18:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation Techwritar (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted two other edits you made to closed AfD pages – please start discussions at WP:DRV and follow the steps under "Instructions" on that page. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 18:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Heading added, chronological order restored ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Techwritar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I observed I didn't study the sources carefully before commenting on the Afd which resulted to being blocked for sock puppet, I promise to study the references carefully next time before commenting in any Afd. As for being blocked for sock puppet, I don't think that is necessary because I'm not in any way connected to the subject and I have never been paid to edit Wikipedia Techwritar (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Welcome back: You are unblocked under the following unblock conditions:

Instead of directly creating articles about any topic, you will create them as "Draft:"s, which can easily be submitted for review by adding "{{subst:submit}}" at the top of the page.
You will not create articles nor drafts about living or recently deceased people, companies, products or commercial topics, broadly construed.
You will not participate in deletion discussions, especially not about articles you have any connection to.
You will not edit drafts that have been declined at least twice by reviewers, no matter for which reason.

These conditions are for an indefinite amount of time, and can be appealed individually at WP:AN at any time. Ideas for constructive contributions can be found at the community portal and the Task Center. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This block is not purely based on technical evidence, per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Felicia112/Archive. I'll have a look later. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ST47, could you have a quick look at the "Accept reason" at Special:PermanentLink/952709547 at User talk:NawJee? Do you think we could handle this in a similar way (i.e. do you believe the block could possibly be a mistake), or should we restrict the block appeal to checkusers/ArbCom? I wonder how strong the "Possible" is. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: "possible" meaning that they seem to be in the same location, but there otherwise isn't any technical data confirming or ruling out that they are a sockpuppet. Their editing generally looks COI/PAID-ish, and for so many people from the same location to comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Koverko so quickly seems unlikely, unless there was sockpuppetry or coordination. I have no "checkuser-block" objection to unblocking with conditions, if that's what you'd like to do. ST47 (talk) 01:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Techwritar, do you agree to the following unblock conditions?

Instead of directly creating articles about any topic, you will create them as "Draft:"s, which can easily be submitted for review by adding "{{subst:submit}}" at the top of the page.
You will not create articles nor drafts about living or recently deceased people, companies, products or commercial topics, broadly construed.
You will not participate in deletion discussions, especially not about articles you have any connection to.
You will not edit drafts that have been declined at least twice by reviewers, no matter for which reason.

These conditions are for an indefinite amount of time, and can be appealed individually at WP:AN. Ideas for constructive contributions can be found at the community portal and the Task Center. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Techwritar (talk) 13:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick agreement; I'm unblocking you. Ping ST47: See above; thanks again to you too. Let's see how this works out. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for unblocking me and I'm going to adhere to the instructions. Some articles I created where tagged paid is it still necessary, can you take a look at them.Techwritar (talk) 13:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and thanks again. Regarding the {{undisclosed paid}} tags on some articles, I won't remove them, and you should probably avoid editing these articles. This is not a strict condition, but you should probably stay away from these topics. If the article has been rewritten by a volunteer, the tags will eventually be removed. This may, however, take years, and you'll probably have to accept this. Sorry. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I accept that too, one more question which kind of articles am I permitted to write about, I really love writing and would like to start. Techwritar (talk) 13:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]