User talk:Technobadger
.svg){kind=logo} | This editor has decided to leave Wikipedia. |
The article Change management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There might be a notable topic here, or likelier a couple of notable topics that should be disambiguated ("change management" as in version control; "change management" for organizations). But the bulk of this article is unreferenced and unreadable vaporing: trivial, tautological, and uninformative prose of the kind that gives you a headache when you try to read it. Even the "referenced" bits are nonsense, too: The field of change management grew from the recognition that organizations are composed of people. And the behaviors of people make up the outputs of an organization. Betcha had to go to college to figure that out.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of BugTracker.NET for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BugTracker.NET is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BugTracker.NET until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)