User talk:Technajunky

Mediation -- Middle Eastern Americans

I have opened the case with the mediation cabal which you had filed at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-07 Inclusion of Armenians in Definition of Middle Eastern Americans. Do you wish to proceed with this informal mediation with me as your mediator? Have you contacted the other party about mediation? Alan.ca 08:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will be closing the request for mediation on December 19, 2006 if I do not receive a reply from you and the respondent by that date. Alan.ca 20:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense edit in Isaac Nachman Steinberg

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Isaac Nachman Steinberg. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 09:33, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikistalking

Per WP:STALK: "Wikistalking has been a subject in at least two Arbitration Committee proceedings (and a peripheral matter in a third)." Continue and you will be next. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 09:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I previously warned you about stalking here, but you assured me that "one warning was enough". However, your recent contributions show that you've been following Humus sapiens around, reverting all of his edits and adding speedy deletion tags to articles he's startd. Because of this, I've blocked you for 24 hours, as this sort of behavior is unacceptable. Please review our harassment policy so that this doesn't happen again. Khoi khoi 09:49, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Technajunky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Out of control and biased admin has instigated a user block.

Decline reason:

Well, are you going to stop your disruptive behavior? Removing warnings from your user talk doesn't eliminate them from page history -- I can't unblock you in good conscience without a good explanation of your behavior. Sorry. Luna Santin 10:08, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

added warning blanked by blocked user Also, CheckUser reveals that you've used an IP to circumvent the three-revert rule at Wall of Shame, in addition to using the sockpuppet ElectronFlux on Joe Escalante. Take the time to read WP:SOCK. Khoi khoi 10:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been protected against editing because of repeated blanking of warnings by Technajunky while blocked. Warning messages should not be removed from talk pages; doing so repeatedly despite requests not to do so counts as vandalism. To request that protection be removed, please follow the instructions at WP:RFP. Tonywalton | Talk 10:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Koshti

The article Koshti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is an opinion essay. Also an article with title Koshta already exists on wiki which also confers to the same subject. Either both the articles be suitably merged or this article being full of unsourced contents be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mahensingha 19:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Koshti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Koshti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koshti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mahensingha 20:08, 6 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahensingha (talk • contribs)