User talk:Teambrabos

April 2013

Your recent edit to List of Two and a Half Men episodes has been reverted as it was unconstructive. As was clearly explained in the summary of the edit that you reverted,[1] renewal information should be included in the article lead. The lead is supposed to summarise an article, and did not do this after your edit. Since your edit included only two sentences in the season 11 section, all of this was incorporated into the lead, per convention, and there was no need to duplicate this in a separate section. The article is a list of episodes and, per convention, sections should contain episodes. As no season 11 episodes were included, a season 11 section was not necessary, or appropriate. The season 11 section of the series overview table contained only a link to a now unnecessary section, some vague dates that were unsourced and an episode count that was also unsourced. While deletion was warranted, it was instead commented out. Your reversion also reintroduced a number of errors including removal of {{start date}} and {{end date}}, which were added when it was noticed that they had been omitted, minor formatting errors and a violation of WP:REFPUNCT. It also reverted a properly formatted citation to a bare url. None of what you reverted is considered vandalism, so your claim that it was in your edit summary,[2] was inappropriate. No referenced information was removed, despite the edit summary, in fact the referencing was improved, and the changes were explained, so that part of your summary was inaccurate as well. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Response

According to that then shouldn't you remove that on the list of episodes for Game of Thrones, The Big Bang Theory, Glee, and more - the list goes on? How come it is appropriate on pretty much any other page?