User talk:TeaAndCake1819

Hello, NorthTyneside, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 15:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NorthTyneside, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NorthTyneside! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TeaAndCake1819 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

TeaAndCake1819 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Your reason here - It is the place I live. I am happy to change the name. Thank you;

Accept reason:

globally renamed NorthTyneside1819 to TeaAndCake1819. Sorry for the inconvenience. Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed your request for proper display(you highlight and copy it when viewing this page then open the edit window and paste it, filling in the information). 331dot (talk) 13:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace the words "new username" with your choice of name; or if you are just creating a new account, please indicate that. 331dot (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

if it's

their address, do they really need a rename? Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think I blocked this because it suggests they represent the local government as they are editing about local government officials, but I'm content with your judgment on this. 331dot (talk) 18:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably eliminate the appearance of editing on the behalf of North Tyneside. Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed NorthTyneside1819 to TeaAndCake1819

globally renamed NorthTyneside1819 to TeaAndCake1819. Sorry for the inconvenience. Welcome back. Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BLP and sources

Please read my edit summaries for the last two times I've reverted you, you need to provide a reliable source, not a blog and provide relevance to the article. Please discuss it on the talk page and get consensus as continuing to reinstate this contested edit is directly against WP:BLP policy. Praxidicae (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a blog post on the News site where Mark Wallace is the editor! Sorry if I’m wrong but this is fairly clear

If it's not covered anywhere that is independent and reliable it's rather unlikely it should be in the article, then. Praxidicae (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor

Greetings, TeaAndCake1819! First of all, I wanted to thank you for your additions to Norma Redfearn; they are a welcome improvement to the article! The reason I am here is I that I noticed that you are marking most of your edits as "minor" and I wanted to make sure that you understood what "minor" means in Wikipedia's parlance. My guess is that you have the same mentality that I did when I first started: "I'm not really changing a great deal of the article, so it's not really a major edit." Here at Wikipedia, however, nearly all edits are considered "major" for our purposes. There is a great deal more information about this at Help:Minor edit, but in summary, the only time we should be marking edits is when we are making minor typographical changes that do not alter the underlying meaning of an article in any way. This can include adding a link (but not changing the semantics of that link), fixing spelling or punctuation, and the like, but that's about it. If you are adding or changing even the tiniest bit of content, that would be considered a major edit and should not be marked as minor.

The reason we avoid marking edits as minor as much as we can is because they are supposed to be edits that shouldn't even need to be checked by other editors. In fact, many editors filter minor edits out of their watchlists and recent changes lists. In most cases, though, it's good to have a second set of eyes on our edits even if we think they are tiny or completely uncontroversial, as others may have different opinions or perhaps we made a typo of our own, etc. It's even okay to leave truly minor edits unmarked; other editors don't mind reviewing small edits, and it gives them reassurance that you know what you are doing and aren't trying to "slip something past them." In fact, you could decide to never check that box again and it would be perfectly acceptable, even if you are only adding a comma, for example.

I definitely wanted to emphasize that there aren't any problems with your edits that I can see! You're adding useful content with sources to back it up, which is exactly what we need. So be proud of those edits and leave them marked as the major edits that they are. :) If you have questions about this, or anything else for that matter, I am happy to answer them as best I can. You can leave me a message on my own talk page, or you can answer me here (but if you do, be sure to "ping" me by using {{ping|Cthomas3}} somewhere in the message and then signing it with four tildes (~~~~) at the end—that will give me a notification that you've left me a message). Regards, CThomas³ (talk) 17:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John O'Shea (politician) has been accepted

John O'Shea (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

lovkal (talk) 14:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John O'Shea (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John O'Shea (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John O'Shea (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]