User talk:Tddhoz

Welcome!

Hello, Tddhoz, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Tddhoz, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Your recent editing history at Miss Shilling's orifice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 11:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Posted the above as a required warning before proceeding to WP:ANI. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 11:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 13:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78171

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link to ANI thread -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tddhoz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for “persistently making disruptive edits”.

I am a fairly new editor, and unwittingly trampled a few Wikipedia rules. For example, I did not realise that there was a limit to the number of times you could revert text back to the way you had edited it. I did not in fact know “edit warring” existed.

I also didn’t realise that you couldn’t move a page when it had been discussed and there was not consensus. (Whereas I did read an invocation to “be bold” and move a page if you could — which I followed.)

Also due to inexperience, I did not notice that I had received a warning.

In any case, going forward, I’m now aware of those things, and would be abiding by the Wikipedia rules.

For that reason, I believe the block is unnecessary. Tddhoz (talk) 09:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your logged out editing. You seem to acknowledge your actions, but don't describe what you will do to correct them, so I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.