User talk:Tdavis47

This user is a student editor in University_of_Wyoming/Architectural_History_(Fall_2019) .

Welcome!

Hello, Tdavis47, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info Whose work are you reviewing?: Tdavis47 Link to draft you're reviewing: Architecture of Africa Lead

Guiding questions: Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?: YES Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?: YES Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?: YES Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?: YES Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?: YES

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?:YES Is the content added up-to-date?: YES Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?: NO

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?: YES Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?: NO Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?: NO Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?: NO

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?: YES Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?: YES Are the sources current?: YES Check a few links. Do they work?: YES

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?: YES Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?: NO Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?: YES

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?: YES Are images well-captioned?: YES Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?: YES Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?: YES

Alkahale (talk) 01:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC) ALLISON HALE[reply]