User talk:Tbrittreid/Archive/2009/November

Talk: Wiseguy edits

It's generally considered taboo to edit other folk's comments on talk pages. This goes against my editorial reflexes, but them's the rules. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't You Ever Forget Audie Murphy

Hello, Guns Magazine is the title of that publication. I added the source to the end of that sentence (it was at the end of the section). Here's a link if you care to read it: [1] If you can come up with a reliable print source stating otherwise, please bring it forward, Taffin is the only neutral third party source I can find...I'm not sure if IMDB is approved or not. Thanks--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

1. Please stop talking down to me, last time I checked you didn't sign my paycheck. I'm posting on your talkpage, because posting on my talkpage seems stupid, makes me feel like I'm talking to myself.

2. OK, whatever melts your butter.

3. If you don't trust Find Articles, or myself, how about the magazine's own website: [2], beyond that I can't help you out, jack, unless you want Roy Huntington's (the Editor's)email, times like this make me wish I would have taken his advice about people who write on the interweb.

4. Does she give a count? If you have a print source with an ISBN, why are you wasting people's time talking about it? I would think a print source of that nature would trump a magazine article, even if it is a fine publication as Guns Magazine. Doesn't matter to me, either way. Although I'd trust John Taffin before most mainstream press types.

If I offended your anti-gun metro sensibilities, I apologize. Well, not really, but it seemed the thing to say.  :) --Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 01:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

By the way, this was what I was referring to:Wikipedia:Verifiability, regarding a source. Please cite your book if you have it and it has numbers, etc, I don't read those kind of books, but you sound like you know your film stuff. I was just reporting what I could verify via John Taffin's article.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 01:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

8. (I think) Shit I don't know, dude. The cited article said 39, shoot John an email and ask him if you're that worried about it. Again, if you have a book, that should trump it and go into greater detail than the Taffin piece. If you're worried about what Guns Magazine was called in 2003 when John wrote the piece, send me your email address and I'll email you a scanned copy, the final page of the Find articles link has it properly cited.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 01:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Danger Man DVD

The link to the network 30 min DVD only goes to the wikisite and not to networks page advertising it. Did I do wrong? I only did this as the source was being challenged by an editor I have had some trouble with who tried to delete all the TV title images I have uploaded and looking at edits to see what mischief can be done.REVUpminster (talk) 00:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

• Thankyou, I see you did the link again but I have corrected it to take it to the actual page on the network site[3].REVUpminster (talk) 22:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Sorry our messages crossed. I did wonder if in America you could pick up the network site because I've found I cannot always go from a link to a site. For instance, Cimarron Strip, since the DVD's went on sale over here I have been unable to access the official site run by Stuart Whitman.REVUpminster (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)