User talk:Tbmartinwiki

Welcome

Hello Tbmartinwiki, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Tbmartinwiki, good luck, and have fun. --Shinerunner (talk) 00:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dennis Lukens seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Giant Snowman 11:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dennis Lukens. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:59, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Improving references

How would you suggest I improve the references? The information I added is factual, accurate, and relevant. What portion of what I added is not true or substantiated by the references I added? Tbmartinwiki (talk) 10:46, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find reliable secondary source discussing the camps and any alleged problems. That means news papers or something of that sort. Not websites for camps, court documents, review sites, complaint sites (including the BBB) or any other such sites. If you are unable to find these, then the content doesn't belong, no matter if you feel it is 'factual, accurate, and relevant' since that's how wikipedia works. Nil Einne (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]