User talk:Tayyabk52

This is Tayyabk52's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Command Operation Center Pakistan (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Command Operation Center Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:National Command Operation Center Pakistan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tayyabk52! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the refernces though, it is a national organisation the refernces are enough to be published. I'll keep updating it more and more as references pop up Tayyabk52 (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Your edit to Azad Kashmir has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Kuru (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, sorry i didnt know about that thing before. I will be careful in future Tayyabk52 (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Removing sourced content based on false basis

Don't do this again and see WP:RS. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 14:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well can you tell me how is that thing exactly an "reaction" from the government? Tayyabk52 (talk) 19:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That whole text concerning Pakistan is not just about what their government said but what happened from Pakistan after the fall of Kabul. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 05:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well surely indian sources will say everything bad occurred without even a single evidence. Stop putting false stuff everywhere Tayyabk52 (talk) 11:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your definition of evidence is "what I agree with", but see WP:JDL. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 12:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you even? Just do your work dont bother me here please. And everything i edit or add is according to sources so dont worry about my stuff just do yours. Have a nice day Tayyabk52 (talk) 14:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are unwilling to explain your edits any further, then fine but getting back to removing the same reliably sourced content in question is disruptive. Use talk page next time per WP:BRD and find WP:CONSENSUS. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 15:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should explain your own edits. And stop being part of false propaganda. My edits are only based upon various sources not just "indian" sources as per you. And none of your added statements are even concerning the reaction of government. Similar things were removed from the indian reaction too but ofcourse you wouldn't bother. Tayyabk52 (talk) 16:51, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I explained my edits very well. If you don't want to understand it's not my fault. Do not text me again regarding this because i am not doing something out of world. All my information is based upon sources and for your information all the information in the pakistani section is updated by me and none of them are vague or without references. And are fitting absolutely perfectly for the purpose of the page. Tayyabk52 (talk) 16:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Georgethedragonslayer, this new user has repeatedly been removing sourced content. I therefore, request you to report him at the WP:ANI. We can't keep on reverting his unproductive edits.--Baamiyaan2 (talk) 03:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well report yourself too because you're doing same.

Tayyabk52 (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Tayyabk52, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to Pakistan, we hope you'll stay and add content to Pakistan-related articles. Pakistani topics are generally underrepresented on Wikipedia and you can help counter this imbalance by becoming a regular contributor and by joining or watchlisting Pakistan-related discussions (for example, Notice board for Pakistan-related topics). Again, welcome!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Abdulhaseebatd (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Global Terrorism Index has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Clearly not a typo Doug Weller talk 18:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh i am sorry brother. I actually had it copied on my clipboard and didn't realise. Since i made certains edits because they were being changed by someone and quite different from the sources. I mistakenly put it there while editing. My apology. Regards Tayyabk52 (talk) 19:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block

Your editing at Reactions to the Fall of Kabul (2021) is highly disruptive, with no regard for Wikipedia's sourcing policies, nor any interest in what more experienced editors tell you. You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Reactions to the Fall of Kabul (2021). If you go on to disrupt other pages, you may be blocked from the whole of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 19:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tayyabk52 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i would like to apologise but my edits are based upon all sources. You can check the Pakistani section of that page is literally built and updated by me, with all sources. I will keep in mind in future, kindly give me a chance still. Tayyabk52 (talk) 20:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm leaving your unblock request to an uninvolved admin, but I will reply to your statement that your edits are "based upon all sources". You say specifically that you have no respect for Indian sources, such as The Indian Express. Compare this edit summary, with a link to show the reliability of The Indian Express, which you rode right over here and here. Did you even bother to read the linked RfC? Note that you still have the rest of Wikipedia to edit, including Talk:Reactions to the Fall of Kabul (2021). Bishonen | tålk 20:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

They really are from sources though. I am just confused because when similar things were added to the indian part of reaction, everyone removed it with resources too. Can you please elaborate how indian part of wikipedia page can't have other information other than government reaction in indian reaction but pakistan can have? This is why i removed these things from pakistani section too because that specific thing "left an impact" that only government reactions had to be added in the information not the commentary by the news sources. Regards. Tayyabk52 (talk) 07:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will still apologise, it is upto you guys if you want to unblock me. But you should keep an eye on the contributions i had made. Tayyabk52 (talk) 07:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you describe what you were trying to say when you urged me to "stop being part of false propaganda"? Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 07:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm not sure if you are aware. Lately indian people are editing stuff and one example is in global terrorism index on wikipedia someone edited and put pakistan twice in row and removed india from there completely. When i checked back i found out it was india at that place. Similarly similar stuff which are being put in the Pakistani section of current wikipedia page discussion,were removed from the indian section saying it wasn't counted as a government reaction. So it's not new indian people are doing propaganda here against pakistan on pages that's why i raised suspicion about you too. Tayyabk52 (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways. I cleared up what i had to say. It's upto to the admins if they want to unblock me keeping things in clear position. I dont have anything against anyone, only contributing to things on wiki with sources Tayyabk52 (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National Command Operation Center Pakistan

Hello, Tayyabk52. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Command Operation Center Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:National Command Operation Center Pakistan

Hello, Tayyabk52. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Command Operation Center Pakistan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]