User talk:Taylorsm

Carnivore diet edits

Please read the talk page for perspective. Content has been thoroughly discussed. --Zefr (talk) 21:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did. It seems to have arguments for and against. Yet you are allowing someone to hijack it and redirect it, this isn't a neutral view. It is clearly biased. I don't even do this diet, so I don't have a bias to protect unlike you and this other person apparently. Taylorsm (talk) 22:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring and disruption. This also could be a compromised account as you are editing from the same location as a persistent joe-jobbing sock account.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Taylorsm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

people are allowing a page to be hijacked and vandalized by redirecting. The previous version didn't claim anything was scientifically proven yet these people are redirecting in an attempt to discredit the page due to their own bias. This is obvious because you didn't block the other party that was also editing the pages after me. Therefore committing the same "warring" Taylorsm (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. You need to address your violations of WP:EW. It's not relevant what other people were doing. You need to show you did not engage in edit warring, or that you established a firm consensus for your change. Yamla (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Now

Confirmed to CarnivoreDiet.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]