User talk:Taylor 49

Welcome!

Hello, Taylor 49, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case

Hi there. I also wrote it on your request but I wanted to reiterate here. This project can only deal with local matters. If you wish to have outside help when no recourse is available on the project in question, meta:Requests for comment allows you to start a new discussion about this with people interested in helping with such problems. I suggest you withdraw your request for Arbitration here and start such a discussion at meta-wiki. Regards So Why 12:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your comments. I am less happy with "Even if all of that were true" - do you assume bad faith? I have already placed a request at meta:Requests for comment. Now we can await the result. What is the benefit with withdrawing the request here? The issue points a real problem: the lack of procedures to handle such cases (one dictator completely owning a Wiki) and the lack of useful information. There is no lack of text, the problem is that all existing text just points nowhere (to Jimbo who does not want to have such cases, to The Arbitration Committee that doesn't exist, to stewards who don't want to do anything, ... etc). Taylor 49 (talk) 12:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not assuming anything, which is my point. Whether it's true or not does not matter because en-wiki ArbCom has no power to resolve disputes on other projects. So if you don't withdraw your request, all that will happen is another six arbitrators will say no and then the request will be closed anyway. You can save them the trouble. With meta-RFC there is a way to handle such cases and lack of useful information should probably be addressed at meta-wiki as well because that is the project that was created to handle such problems. Regards So Why 13:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The request has been formally declined. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:34, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I have been offline during the weekend. Now either "meta-RFC" or User talk:Jimbo Wales will have to bother with the case. Taylor 49 (talk) 09:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Taylor 49! You created a thread called Page "Gramophone" is badly needed at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Taylor 49 (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm QueerEcofeminist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Frank Bacon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 13:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recheck your facts before accusing me of vandalism, sending me to the sandbox, or threatening with "level". Taylor 49 (talk) 13:29, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Single-party government" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Single-party government and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 11#Single-party government until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]