User talk:Tawkerbot2/FAQ
 | This page is currently protected from editing. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. You may request an edit to this page, or ask for it to be unprotected. |
Noooo illegal "preventative" protection!! 68.39.174.238 02:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Not exactly, its already been a vandal magnet -- Tawker 02:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Good catch, well done! Andrewa 05:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Another user thought an edit I had made to Templar (disambiguation) was reverted by this Bot, but it was not my edit.
--SKT1314 09:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I need your help regarding the edits I made to article on Khatri.
One was about making the right link to the The Seth surname. The other was about Walias also being called Ahluwalias, which a link made for Walia surname. They were reverted back by moderator3000. Both modications made by me are completely valid and they should be allowed on the article.
interference
I am the original contributor of the article Optimal classification who has been tasked with both initiating various paragraphs as the result of comments or questions and tasked with editing and clarifying the meaning of the paragraphs I have created. The process of clarification and revision of such paragraphs is critical to maintaining the quality of the article. Please instruct your bot to check first for my used ID before reverting my edits otherwise its role will be counterproductive making the Wikipedia worse rather than better. Thanks in advance. IMHO 16:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
legimitate edit
wow. i got nabbed by tawkerbot2. i'm reverting a legimitate edit. it's a curse word, but it's with in a quote. Sparsefarce 18:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Henry of Castile
The true history is the king was gay, love men and don't love women, but i know this aspect is very important, but we must write the true history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.120.5.47 (talk • contribs)
The bot deleted all of the text I wrote, and then reverted it to an old, not so good copy of the article. Pls fix. thanks. :) --Noypi380 09:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
The bot correctly identified page blanking. However, the page only had two edits, and it was blanked by the original author who realized he had created it by mistake. While he should have used the db-author tag, he didn't know how. It makes sense that a novice who mistakenly creates an article also won't know how to correctly remove it. The bot should recognize this (rule: <5 edits, possible SD tag, and original author = article blanker) and simply replace the blanking with a db-author tag. Obviously this is an exception to most instances of page blanking, but it's an easy one to trap. Rklawton 19:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)