User talk:Tavaresbbk

Welcome!

Hello, Tavaresbbk, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Bitblocks - Criptocurrency, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bitblocks - Criptocurrency

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bitblocks - Criptocurrency, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bitblocks - Criptocurrency (June 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Rich Smith was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 17:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tavaresbbk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 17:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please promote your cryptocurrency elsewhere

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its not promote ... see the nano wiki :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano_(cryptocurrency)

just saw the wiki from nano and other cryptos and decided to make one of the bitblocks , tried to adjust not to look like own marketing, but if the rule goes for me , has to be worth to everyone correct?

Nano was covered in Forbes and numerous other reliable sources. You were told twice that your submissions didn't meet our notability guidelines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , thanks for the clarifications , an answer so is much better to understand than a ready message , now understand why it was refused , I'm sorry , if possible remove the ban , I will not publish more on the bitblocks until it appears on a renowned economics site.

You can submit an unblock request, as described above. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tavaresbbk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just went to insert an article about Bitblocks , since I found articles about other cryptocurrencies , had not understood that to enter the wiki it takes recognition of sites specialized in world economy , I'm sorry , who knows in the future this schedule change , this will not happen again. Tavaresbbk (talk) 20:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS 31282

[https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/31282 This UTRS is now closed. response carried over

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not fully address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked.

You posted promotional content on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a place to advertise. To be unblocked, please agree to not write about or link to BITBLOCKS. Please tell us what constructive edits you would make.

Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks)

As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. Place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 19:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]