User talk:Targatron
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Targatron, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Canadians, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and how to develop articles
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Article wizard for creating new articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 18:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Photo montages
[edit]I'm not seeing a clear consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups to remove the photo montages. The discussion ended almost a month ago with a call for an RFC to ensure wider support. Was that ever done? Somehow I doubt it or I suspect that you would have linked to that rather then the talk page discussion. I don't really care one or the other if the montages are included, but I don't think it is appropriate to claim a site-wide decision has been reached based solely on that discussion by a limited number of editors. I suggest thatt you call the RFC.Meters (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- The call for an RfC was only yesterday, Meters. As you've seen, one has now been opened. Cordless Larry (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yup, I misread the date. Meters (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Slavs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Slavs was changed by Targatron (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868355 on 2015-12-01T11:41:34+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Nina Dobrev shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization Talk 03:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 09:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Blocked
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en
wikimedia.org with your username and appeal.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.