User talk:Tara Eckersberg

February 2009

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Tap 011. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Megaman en m (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tap 011, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. It appears that you created this page which would qualify you to blank it, however, you don't have it listed. If you created the page, please remove this warning. Spencer Divonn'io the Glorious 17:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

If U Seek Amy

I noticed that you added "Out From Under" as the next single from Circus in the article for "If U Seek Amy", yet you didn't internally cite your source. Please either cite your source or remove the unsourced content form the article. Thanks! --Caponer (talk) 04:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Tap011 - Igra.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Tap011 - Igra.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tap 011

Ovaj bend ne moze da se nadje na listi srpskih rock bendova jer jednostavno nije rock bend. Ostalocutanje (talk) 20:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kylie Minogue - Secret (Take You Home).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie Minogue - Secret (Take You Home).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Alcazar 2002 - Casino.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Alcazar 2002 - Casino.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 22:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Alcazar 2000 Casino.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alcazar 2000 Casino.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alcazar 2009 Disco Defenders.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Alcazar 2009 Disco Defenders.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Negative

Pisem tebi ovu poruku jer je tvoje korisnicko ime najcesce na istoriji izmena stranice, pa pretpostavljam da sam izmenio tvoje izmene, ako gresim, izivni.

Negative uopste nije alternative rock band.
Na Wikipedii se imena albuma pisu samo italikom (bez navodnika), a imena pesama samo pod navodnicima (bez italika).
Na Wikipedii se u diskografiji obicno prvo pise ime albuma ili singla a godina izdanja se pise u zagradi.
Dovoljni su samo prevodi imena albuma, navoditi prevod imena svake pesme je krajnje suvisno (a u diskografiji se to obicno ne stavlja, prevod imena albuma ili pesme se najcesce pise u samom tekstu).
Ne moze se jednostavno reci da je "Negative svojom pesmom pokazao da srpska muzika ima potencijala", da su "dobili pohvale na youtubeu", da su "mnogi koji su videli njihove spotove zeleli da saznaju gde moze da se kupi njihov disk"... To je: 1. Pristrasno, 2. Nepotvrdjeno i 3. Nije nesto sto bi smelo pisati u eciklopediji. Ostalocutanje (talk) 11:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World Dance Chart

Please do not add the World Dance Chart, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 02:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The World Singles chart on acharts.us is a mirror of the United World Chart, which is listed on WP:BADCHARTS. Do not add it to any Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 00:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please be more careful? I can see that you are trying to improve Wikipedia, but edits like this one get annoying to clean up after. The Brazil Hot 100 is the reason that WP:BADCHARTS got started. Please check your chart additions against WP:BADCHARTS before adding things to articles.—Kww(talk) 23:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Alcazar_-_Burning_(CDS).jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Alcazar_-_Burning_(CDS).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Alcazar songs

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Alcazar songs. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Alcazar songs. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of AfD notice

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with List of Alcazar songs. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. - eo (talk) 13:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with List of Alcazar songs, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:213.198.195.120

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with List of Alcazar songs, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 23:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tara Eckersberg

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for removal of AfD tags, sockpuppetry, abusing multiple accounts to avoid 3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of a deleted page

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as List of Alcazar songs, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism, disruption, repeated recreation of deleted article, ignoring talk page communication. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 16:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dannii Minogue vs. J.C.A - Come and Get It.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dannii Minogue vs. J.C.A - Come and Get It.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I'll Do It like a Truck

The article I'll Do It like a Truck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this meets notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of I'll Do You like a Truck

I have nominated I'll Do You like a Truck, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Do You like a Truck. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AFD notices

Do not remove AFD notices from articles. Doing so is considered disruptive, and doing so repeatedly will result in you being blocked. With your block log, it will probably be an extremely long block.—Kww(talk) 23:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥ 17:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tara Eckersberg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i made a mistake, and it won't happen' again

Decline reason:

You've been warned (and blocked) several times in the past. We should we believe you when you say you've learned your lesson? TN X Man 12:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tara Eckersberg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

well, i wasn't aware of the consequences, and to be honest, i'm tottaly confused with this rules (needed to get my account unblocked), so i'm sorry if this is not written right. i hope u will understand, and, at least - consider my appeal

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Come and Get It.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Come and Get It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I'll Do You like a Truck.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I'll Do You like a Truck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kylie Minogue - Secret (Take You Home) 2004 Promo Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie Minogue - Secret (Take You Home) 2004 Promo Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tap011 (Sava Centar).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tap011 (Sava Centar).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:56, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Geo Da Silva

The article Geo Da Silva has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waterfox ^~talk~ 22:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alcazar - From Brazil with Love.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alcazar - From Brazil with Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 5 Element

The article 5 Element has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stowonthewolder (talk) 22:33, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Čudesna Ploča

The article Čudesna Ploča has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stowonthewolder (talk) 22:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Igra (album)

The article Igra (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stowonthewolder (talk) 22:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tap011 - 5Element.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tap011 - 5Element.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:23, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tap011 - ČudesnaPloča.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tap011 - ČudesnaPloča.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tap011 - Igra.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tap011 - Igra.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:31, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alcazar - Start the Fire (Alternate).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alcazar - Start the Fire (Alternate).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tara Eckersberg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been over 9 years since this account containing my actual name and last name got permanently blocked, and it was probably blocked for a good reason back then as I didn't know how to use Wikipedia in a proper way, and as a teenager was too stubborn to find the right way to deal with the warnings etc. I would also like to add that I this time around I would like to learn how to comply with the rules and contribute to Wikipedia in the best possible way that I can as an adult and more mature person I believe I've become over the years.

Accept reason:

Normally I would consult with the blocking admin, but as they are no longer active I'm going out on a limb and give you a chance. 9 years is plenty of time to mature, so I'm willing to accept good faith here - please don't let me down. Welcome back, and feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 22:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]