User talk:Tapio1994

Venetian Snares albums

You have recently reverted a few of my edits where I've WP:BOLD blanked and redirected a few Venetian Snares albums per WP:ATD-R. I believe these articles are not notable - there is not enough significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Can you please respond on the corresponding article talk pages or here as to why you restored them so that an agreement can be reached. Thanks. Alduin2000 (talk) 20:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is my honest opinion that, while indeed, not exactly RICH in information it was still informative and the info that WAS presented was the main reason I went to the pages in question. There for I believe all info should be restored for the page in question and, obiously for all other pages where this change was made. Tapio1994 (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the information on these pages was almost completely unsourced, and often WP:Original research. There is no way of knowing if the information in the pages is correct if no sources on the subject exist. If you can find multiple sources (not just reviews) that give information about the albums then they should certainly be restored but I don't think there is enough coverage so I think they should be changed back to redirects. Alduin2000 (talk) 20:51, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to move this over to the Venetian Snares talk page. Alduin2000 (talk) 20:53, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tapio1994, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tapio1994! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Come to Daddy (song) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 19:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your blanking of Come to Daddy (song): There is process for deleting pages if you want them gone. See Wikipedia:How to delete a page or Wikipedia:Merge 35.20.255.30 (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Come to Daddy (song). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 13:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Come to Daddy (song), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Come to Daddy (song) was changed by Tapio1994 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854418 on 2018-08-22T13:39:21+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Meathole. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 13:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Come to Daddy (song). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:33, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]