User talk:Tapestry1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molly Upton (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Molly Upton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 18:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tapestry1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 18:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Molly Upton has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Molly Upton. Thanks! Devopam (talk) 06:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molly Upton (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Molly Upton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Molly Upton

Hi Tapestry1. Both Cullen328 and I have responded to your question at the Teahouse [1]. The upshot is... I've accepted your draft after some basic copyediting, reference formatting, and the addition of a new reference. I've tagged the article as needing copyediting as there are places where it needs editing for encyclopedic tone as well as formatting to conform to Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I've also asked for some help on that front from WikiProject Women in Red. In the meantime, feel free to work on and improve Molly Upton and thank you so much for creating it. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 09:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Molly Upton Photo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Molly Upton Photo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Molly Upton Photo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Molly Upton Photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: You've got messages!

Hello, Tapestry1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]